Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models

被引:377
作者
Clark, Martyn P. [1 ]
Fan, Ying [2 ]
Lawrence, David M. [1 ]
Adam, Jennifer C. [3 ]
Bolster, Diogo [4 ]
Gochis, David J. [1 ]
Hooper, Richard P. [5 ]
Kumar, Mukesh [6 ]
Leung, L. Ruby [7 ]
Mackay, D. Scott [8 ]
Maxwell, Reed M. [9 ]
Shen, Chaopeng [10 ]
Swenson, Sean C. [1 ]
Zeng, Xubin [11 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[4] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Earth Sci, South Bend, IN USA
[5] Consortium Univ, Adv Hydrol Sci Inc, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[7] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[8] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Geog, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[9] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Geol & Geol Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[10] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, State Coll, PA USA
[11] Univ Arizona, Dept Atmospher Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LAND-SURFACE SCHEME; STORAGE BOUSSINESQ MODEL; ROOT-WATER-UPTAKE; GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS; VARIABLE SOURCE AREAS; SOIL-MOISTURE; RICHARDS EQUATION; PART I; NUMERICAL-SOLUTION; SUBSURFACE FLOW;
D O I
10.1002/2015WR017096
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many of the scientific and societal challenges in understanding and preparing for global environmental change rest upon our ability to understand and predict the water cycle change at large river basin, continent, and global scales. However, current large-scale land models (as a component of Earth System Models, or ESMs) do not yet reflect the best hydrologic process understanding or utilize the large amount of hydrologic observations for model testing. This paper discusses the opportunities and key challenges to improve hydrologic process representations and benchmarking in ESM land models, suggesting that (1) land model development can benefit from recent advances in hydrology, both through incorporating key processes (e.g., groundwater-surface water interactions) and new approaches to describe multiscale spatial variability and hydrologic connectivity; (2) accelerating model advances requires comprehensive hydrologic benchmarking in order to systematically evaluate competing alternatives, understand model weaknesses, and prioritize model development needs, and (3) stronger collaboration is needed between the hydrology and ESM modeling communities, both through greater engagement of hydrologists in ESM land model development, and through rigorous evaluation of ESM hydrology performance in research watersheds or Critical Zone Observatories. Such coordinated efforts in advancing hydrology in ESMs have the potential to substantially impact energy, carbon, and nutrient cycle prediction capabilities through the fundamental role hydrologic processes play in regulating these cycles.
引用
收藏
页码:5929 / 5956
页数:28
相关论文
共 299 条
  • [1] Towards a public, standardized, diagnostic benchmarking system for land surface models
    Abramowitz, G.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 5 (03) : 819 - 827
  • [2] Evaluating the Performance of Land Surface Models
    Abramowitz, Gab
    Leuning, Ray
    Clark, Martyn
    Pitman, Andy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2008, 21 (21) : 5468 - 5481
  • [3] BioEarth: Envisioning and developing a new regional earth system model to inform natural and agricultural resource management
    Adam, Jennifer C.
    Stephens, Jennie C.
    Chung, Serena H.
    Brady, Michael P.
    Evans, R. David
    Kruger, Chad E.
    Lamb, Brian K.
    Liu, Mingliang
    Stoeckle, Claudio O.
    Vaughan, Joseph K.
    Rajagopalan, Kirti
    Harrison, John A.
    Tague, Christina L.
    Kalyanaraman, Ananth
    Chen, Yong
    Guenther, Alex
    Leung, Fok-Yan
    Leung, L. Ruby
    Perleberg, Andrew B.
    Yoder, Jonathan
    Allen, Elizabeth
    Anderson, Sarah
    Chandrasekharan, Bhagyam
    Malek, Keyvan
    Mullis, Tristan
    Miller, Cody
    Nergui, Tsengel
    Poinsatte, Justin
    Reyes, Julian
    Zhu, Jun
    Choate, Janet S.
    Jiang, Xiaoyan
    Nelson, Roger
    Yoon, Jin-Ho
    Yorgey, Georgine G.
    Johnson, Kristen
    Chinnayakanahalli, Kiran J.
    Hamlet, Alan F.
    Nijssen, Bart
    Walden, Von
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 129 (3-4) : 555 - 571
  • [4] Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability
    Alcamo, J
    Döll, P
    Henrichs, T
    Kaspar, F
    Lehner, B
    Rösch, T
    Siebert, S
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2003, 48 (03): : 317 - 337
  • [5] Global Evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP Continental Hydrological System. Part I: Comparison to GRACE Terrestrial Water Storage Estimates and In Situ River Discharges
    Alkama, R.
    Decharme, B.
    Douville, H.
    Becker, M.
    Cazenave, A.
    Sheffield, J.
    Voldoire, A.
    Tyteca, S.
    Le Moigne, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2010, 11 (03) : 583 - 600
  • [6] Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite-derived North American River Width data set
    Allen, George H.
    Pavelsky, Tamlin M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 42 (02) : 395 - 402
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, DOI DOI 10.1002/2015WR017198
  • [8] [Anonymous], IFS DOC CY40R1 OP 4
  • [9] [Anonymous], WATER RESOUR RES
  • [10] [Anonymous], 0092 US GEOL SURV