All in the family:: Evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results

被引:156
作者
Hughes, C
Lerman, C
Schwartz, M
Peshkin, BN
Wenzel, L
Narod, S
Corio, C
Tercyak, KP
Hanna, D
Isaacs, C
Main, D
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Oncol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Div Epidemiol, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[4] Womens Coll Hosp, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS | 2002年 / 107卷 / 02期
关键词
family communication; genetic testing; BRCA1 and BRCA2;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.10110
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Despite the potential importance of family communication, little is known about the process and content of communicating BRCA1/2 test results to relatives. The objectives of this observational study were to describe the process and content of communicating BRCA1/2 test results to sisters, and to evaluate whether the proband's carrier status influenced communication outcomes. Participants were 43 women who were the first family member to have genetic testing (probands). Probands reported on communication outcomes for 81 sisters. Process and content variables were evaluated 1-month after receipt of BRCA1/2 test results using the Family Communication Questionnaire (FCQ). Overall, BRCA1/2 test results were communicated to 85% of sisters, and carriers communicated their results to significantly more sisters compared to uninformative (96% vs. 76%, FET = 0.02). The most important reason for communicating results was to provide genetic risk information; however, compared to uninformatives, carriers communicated their results to significantly more sisters to obtain emotional support (74%) and to get advice about medical decisions (42%) (FET = 0.001). Carriers also discussed the possibility of discrimination and recommendations for cancer management with significantly more sisters. Among sisters to whom BRCA1/2 test results were not communicated, the most important reason for not sharing test results was because of emotionally distant relationships. The results of this study suggest that probands are likely to quickly communicate their BRCA1/2 test results to relatives and that although needs for social support may motivate family communication, emotionally distant relationships may be a barrier to communication with relatives. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 150
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION Q
[2]  
[Anonymous], J HLTH CARE LAW POLI
[3]  
Benedict S, 1997, CANCER PRACT, V5, P213
[4]  
Biesecker BB, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V93, P257, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20000814)93:4<257::AID-AJMG1>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-8
[6]   A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing - Commentary [J].
Botkin, JR ;
Croyle, RT ;
Smith, KR ;
Baty, BJ ;
Lerman, C ;
Goldgar, DE ;
Ward, JM ;
Flick, BJ ;
Nash, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (13) :872-882
[7]   Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Burke, W ;
Daly, M ;
Garber, J ;
Botkin, J ;
Kahn, MJE ;
Lynch, P ;
McTierman, A ;
Offit, K ;
Perlman, J ;
Petersen, G ;
Thomson, E ;
Varricchio, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12) :997-1003
[8]   BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer [J].
Couch, FJ ;
DeShano, ML ;
Blackwood, MA ;
Calzone, K ;
Stopfer, J ;
Campeau, L ;
Ganguly, A ;
Rebbeck, T ;
Weber, BL ;
Jablon, L ;
Cobleigh, MA ;
Hoskins, K ;
Garber, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) :1409-1415
[9]  
DudokdeWit AC, 1997, AM J MED GENET, V71, P63, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970711)71:1<63::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-T