Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children - A meta-analysis

被引:234
作者
Aziz, O [1 ]
Athanasiou, T [1 ]
Tekkis, PP [1 ]
Purkayastha, S [1 ]
Haddow, J [1 ]
Malinovski, V [1 ]
Paraskeva, P [1 ]
Darzi, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Surg Oncol & Technol, St Marys Hosp, London W2 1NY, England
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000193602.74417.14
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aims to use meta-analysis to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a pediatric population. Summary Background Data: Meta-analysis is a statistical tool that can be used to evaluate the literature in both qualitative and quantitative ways, accounting for variations in characteristics that can influence overall estimate of outcomes of interest. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a pediatric population has not previously been performed. Methods: Comparative studies published between 1992 and 2004 of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children were included. Endpoints were postoperative pyrexia, ileus, wound infection, intraabdominal abscess formation, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay. Results: Twenty-three studies including 6477 children (43% laparoscopic, 57% open) were included. Wound infection was significantly reduced with laparoscopic versus open appendectomy (1.5% versus 5%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.75), as was ileus (1.3% versus 2.8%; OR = 0.5, 95% Cl, 0.29-0.86). Intra-abdominal abscess formation was more common following laparoscopic surgery, although this was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis of randomized trials did not reveal significant difference between the 2 techniques in any of the 4 complications. Operative time was not significantly longer in the laparoscopic group, and postoperative stay was significantly shorter (weighted mean difference, -0.48; 95% Cl, -0.65 to -0.31). Sensitivity analysis identified lowest heterogeneity when only randomized studies were considered, followed by prospective, recent, and finally large studies. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that laparoscopic appendectomy in children reduces complications. However, we also see the need for further high-quality randomized trials comparing the 2 techniques, matched not only for age and sex but also for obesity and severity of appendicitis.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SYSTEMATIC REV HEALT
  • [2] Do off-pump techniques reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
    Athanasiou, T
    Aziz, O
    Mangoush, O
    Weerasinghe, A
    Al-Ruzzeh, S
    Purkayastha, S
    Pepper, J
    Amrani, M
    Glenville, B
    Casula, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (05) : 1567 - 1574
  • [3] Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting
    Athanasiou, T
    Aziz, O
    Skapinakis, P
    Perunovic, B
    Hart, J
    Crossman, MC
    Gorgoulis, V
    Glenville, B
    Casula, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (06) : 2141 - 2146
  • [4] Azaro E M, 1999, JSLS, V3, P279
  • [5] Blakely M L, 1998, Semin Pediatr Surg, V7, P225
  • [6] Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: The procedure of choice?
    Canty, TG
    Collins, D
    Losasso, B
    Lynch, F
    Brown, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2000, 35 (11) : 1582 - 1585
  • [7] A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy
    Chung, RS
    Rowland, DY
    Li, P
    Diaz, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [8] Clarke M., 2001, COCHRANE REV HDB, V4
  • [9] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [10] DRONOV AF, 2000, KHIRURGIIA MOSK, V6, P30