On the covariance of two correlated log-odds ratios

被引:17
作者
Bagos, Pantelis G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Greece, Dept Comp Sci & Biomed Informat, GR-35100 Lamia, Greece
关键词
odds ratio; covariance; epidemiology; delta method; contingency tables; correlated outcomes; UNMATCHED CASE-CONTROL; RANDOM-EFFECTS METAANALYSIS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; LEAST-SQUARES; RISK; REGRESSION; EFFICIENCY; FAMILY; TABLE; ILLUSTRATION;
D O I
10.1002/sim.4474
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In many applications two correlated estimates of an effect size need to be considered simultaneously to be combined or compared. Apparently, there is a need for calculating their covariance, which however requires access to the individual data that may not be available to a researcher performing the analysis. We present a simple and efficient method for calculating the covariance of two correlated log-odds ratios. The method is very simple, is based on the well-known large sample approximations, can be applied using only data that are available in the published reports and more importantly, is very general, because it is shown to encompass several previously derived estimates (multiple outcomes, multiple treatments, doseresponse models, mutually exclusive outcomes, genetic association studies) as special cases. By encompassing the previous approaches in a unified framework, the method allows easily deriving estimates for the covariance concerning problems that were not easy to be obtained otherwise. We show that the method can be used to derive the covariance of log-odds ratios from matched and unmatched case-control studies that use the same cases, a situation that has been addressed in the past only using individual data. Future applications of the method are discussed. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1418 / 1431
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   On logit confidence intervals for the odds ratio with small samples [J].
Agresti, A .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (02) :597-602
[2]  
Agresti A, 2013, Categorical data analysis, V3rd
[3]  
Agresti A., 1992, STAT SCI, V7, P131, DOI [10.1214/ss/1177011454, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011454]
[4]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[6]   Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature [J].
Bagos, Pantelis G. .
BMC GENETICS, 2011, 12
[7]   A Multipoint Method for Meta-Analysis of Genetic Association Studies [J].
Bagos, Pantelis G. ;
Liakopoulos, Theodore D. .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (07) :702-715
[8]   Family-based genome-wide association studies [J].
Benyamin, B. ;
Visscher, P. M. ;
McRae, A. F. .
PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2009, 10 (02) :181-190
[9]  
Berkey CS, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2537, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981130)17:22<2537::AID-SIM953>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-C