Measurement of dynamic pressures at the shoe-foot interface during normal walking with various foot orthoses using the FSCAN system

被引:53
作者
Brown, M
Rudicel, S
Esquenazi, A
机构
[1] TUFTS UNIV, NEW ENGLAND MED CTR, BOSTON, MA 02111 USA
[2] TEMPLE UNIV, MOSS REHABIL HOSP, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19122 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107110079601700306
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Foot orthoses are routinely used in clinical practice to redistribute pressure at the shoe-foot interface, although there is very little scientific evidence to support the efficacy of their use. In this study, the FSCAN sensor (an ultrathin in-shoe transducer) was used to determine the efficacy of pressure redistribution with a Plastizote, Spence, cork, and a plastic foot orthosis as compared with control (no orthosis). Measurement variations of up to 18% occurred between sensors, and changes in stance time of up to 5% occurred between the orthoses and the control conditions. In spite of these potentially confounding variables, statistically significant differences in peak pressure between the orthotic types and the control condition (range, 9-146%) were noted. We conclude that Plastizote, cork, and plastic foot orthoses can be beneficial in relieving pressure in certain regions of the shoe-foot interface, but that they may do so at the cost of increasing pressure in other areas of the plantar surface.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 156
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   THE ASSESSMENT OF DYNAMIC FOOT-TO-GROUND CONTACT FORCES AND PLANTAR PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION - A REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION OF CURRENT TECHNIQUES AND CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS [J].
ALEXANDER, IJ ;
CHAO, EYS ;
JOHNSON, KA .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1990, 11 (03) :152-167
[2]  
BAUMAN JH, 1963, LANCET, V1, P629
[3]   STATIC AND DYNAMIC FOOT-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN CLINICAL ORTHOPEDICS [J].
BETTS, RP ;
FRANKS, CI ;
DUCKWORTH, T ;
BURKE, J .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1980, 18 (05) :674-684
[4]   PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION UNDER SYMPTOM-FREE FEET DURING BAREFOOT STANDING [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
RODGERS, MM ;
IIBOSHI, A .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1987, 7 (05) :262-276
[5]   THE MEASUREMENT OF PRESSURES UNDER THE FOOT [J].
DUCKWORTH, T ;
BETTS, RP ;
FRANKS, CI ;
BURKE, J .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1982, 3 (03) :130-141
[6]   EFFECT OF METATARSAL PADS AND THEIR POSITIONING - A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT [J].
HAYDA, R ;
TREMAINE, MD ;
TREMAINE, K ;
BANCO, S ;
TEED, K .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (10) :561-566
[7]   PROSTHETICS, ORTHOTICS, AND ASSISTIVE DEVICES .4. ORTHOTIC MANAGEMENT OF SELECTED DISORDERS [J].
HICKS, JE ;
LEONARD, JA ;
NELSON, VS ;
FISHER, SV ;
ESQUENAZI, A .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1989, 70 :S210-S217
[8]   PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF THE PEDOBAROGRAPH [J].
HOLMES, GB ;
TIMMERMAN, L ;
WILLITS, NH .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1991, 12 (02) :105-108
[9]   A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF METATARSAL PADS ON PLANTAR PRESSURES [J].
HOLMES, GB ;
TIMMERMAN, L .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1990, 11 (03) :141-145
[10]   FOOT PRESSURE MEASUREMENT - A REVIEW OF CLINICAL FINDINGS [J].
LORD, M ;
REYNOLDS, DP ;
HUGHES, JR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1986, 8 (04) :283-294