Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer - Results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists

被引:93
作者
Epstein, JI
Allsbrook, WC
Amin, MB
Egevad, LL
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol Urol & Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[2] Med Coll Georgia, Dept Pathol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[3] Med Coll Georgia, Dept Surg, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[4] Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Dept Urol, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Dept Hematol & Oncol, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Pathol & Cytol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Gleason grade; prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1097/01.pap.0000202017.78917.18
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The Gleason system for prostate cancer was based on a study of 270 patients from the Minneapolis Veterans Administration Hospital in 1966-1967. In 1974, Gleason and the Veterans Administrative Cooperative Urological Research Group expanded this study to,1032 men., These studies formed the basis of the Gleason grading system, which is now endorsed as the primary grading system for prostate cancer by the World Health Organization, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Fascicle on prostate cancer, the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, and the College of American Pathologists. In the nearly 40 years since its inception, several aspects about prostate cancer and its management have changed, most notably serum prostate- specific antigen, transrectal, ultrasonography, 18-gauge needle biopsy sampling, immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of cancer, and radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy as primary treatment modalities. Several aspects of the disease, and consequently the reporting needs, have changed such as reporting cancer on multiple cases in needle biopsies, multiple nodules in prostatectomy, tertiary patterns, variants And variations in prostate cancer. The application of the Gleason system, therefore, has varied considerably in contemporary surgical pathology practice. An International Consensus, Conference attended by 80 urologic pathologists from 20 countries was convened to discuss clarifications and modifications to the Gleason system. This article serves as a,brief overview and summary of the proceedings that have been published in detail in recent literature.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 59
页数:3
相关论文
共 2 条
[1]   The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Amin, MB ;
Egevad, LL ;
Bastacky, S ;
Beltrán, AL ;
Berner, A ;
Billis, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Cheng, L ;
Civantos, F ;
Cohen, C ;
Cohen, MB ;
Datta, M ;
Davis, C ;
Delahunt, B ;
Delprado, W ;
Eble, JN ;
Foster, CS ;
Furusato, M ;
Gaudin, PB ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Iczkowski, KA ;
Jones, EC ;
Lucia, S ;
McCue, PA ;
Nazeer, T ;
Oliva, E ;
Pan, CC ;
Pizov, G ;
Reuter, V ;
Samaratunga, H ;
Sebo, T ;
Sesterhenn, I ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Srigley, JR ;
Suzigan, S ;
Takahashi, H ;
Tamboli, P ;
Tan, PH ;
Têtu, B ;
Tickoo, S ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Troncoso, P ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
True, LD ;
van der Kwast, T ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Wojno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) :1228-1242
[2]  
SRIGLEY JR, IN PRESS ARCH PATHOL