Bcl-2 undergoes phosphorylation by c-Jun N-terminal kinase stress-activated protein kinases in the presence of the constitutively active GTP-binding protein Rac1

被引:362
作者
Maundrell, K [1 ]
Antonsson, B [1 ]
Magnenat, E [1 ]
Camps, M [1 ]
Muda, M [1 ]
Chabert, C [1 ]
Gillieron, C [1 ]
Boschert, U [1 ]
VialKnecht, E [1 ]
Martinou, JC [1 ]
Arkinstall, S [1 ]
机构
[1] GLAXO WELLCOME RES & DEV SA,GENEVA BIOMED RES INST,CH-1228 PLAN LES OUATES,GENEVA,SWITZERLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.272.40.25238
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We have studied the phosphorylation of the Bcl-2 family of proteins by different mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. Purified Bcl-2 was found to be phosphorylated by the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK) p54-SAPK beta, and this is specific insofar as the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) and p38/RK/CSBP (p38) catalyzed only weak modification. Bcl-2 undergoes similar phosphorylation in COS-7 when coexpressed together with p54-SAPK beta and the constitutive Rac1 mutant G12V, This is seen by both (PO4)-P-32 labeling and the appearance of five discrete Bcl-2 bands with reduced gel mobility. As anticipated, both intracellular p54-SAPK beta activation and Bcl-2 phosphorylation are blocked by co-transfection with the MAP kinase specific phosphatase MKP3/PYST1. MAP kinase specificity is also seen in COS-7 cells as Bcl-2 undergoes only weak phosphorylation when co-expressed with enzymatically activated ERK1 or p38, Four critical residues undergoing phosphorylation in COS-7 cells were identified by expression of the quadruple Bcl-2 point mutant T56A, S70A, T74A, S87A. Sequencing phosphopeptides derived from tryptic digests of Bcl-2 indicates that purified GST-p54-SAPK beta phosphorylates identical sites in vitro. This is the first report of Bcl-2 phosphorylation by the JNK/SAPK class of MAP kinases and could indicate a key modification allowing control of Bcl-2 function by cell surface receptors, Rho family GTPases, and/or cellular stresses.
引用
收藏
页码:25238 / 25242
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Inhibition of Bax channel-forming activity by Bcl-2
    Antonsson, B
    Conti, F
    Ciavatta, A
    Montessuit, S
    Lewis, S
    Martinou, I
    Bernasconi, L
    Bernard, A
    Mermod, JJ
    Mazzei, G
    Maundrell, K
    Gambale, F
    Sadoul, R
    Martinou, JC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5324) : 370 - 372
  • [2] PARALLEL SIGNAL-PROCESSING AMONG MAMMALIAN MAPKS
    CANO, E
    MAHADEVAN, LC
    [J]. TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 20 (03) : 117 - 122
  • [3] Identification of a novel regulatory domain in Bcl-x(L) and Bcl-2
    Chang, BS
    Minn, AJ
    Muchmore, SW
    Fesik, SW
    Thompson, CB
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (05) : 968 - 977
  • [4] CHEN CY, 1995, ONCOGENE, V11, P1487
  • [5] Phosphorylation of Bcl-2 protein and association with p21(Ras) in Ras-induced apoptosis
    Chen, CY
    Faller, DV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 271 (05) : 2376 - 2379
  • [6] The role of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in apoptosis induced by ultraviolet C and gamma radiation - Duration of JNK activation may determine cell death and proliferation
    Chen, YR
    Wang, XP
    Templeton, D
    Davis, RJ
    Tan, TH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 271 (50) : 31929 - 31936
  • [7] COHEN P, 1997, IN PRESS TRENDS CELL
  • [8] THE SMALL GTP-BINDING PROTEINS RAC1 AND CDC42 REGULATE THE ACTIVITY OF THE JNK/SAPK SIGNALING PATHWAY
    COSO, OA
    CHIARIELLO, M
    YU, JC
    TERAMOTO, H
    CRESPO, P
    XU, NG
    MIKI, T
    GUTKIND, JS
    [J]. CELL, 1995, 81 (07) : 1137 - 1146
  • [9] NEONATAL MOTONEURONS OVEREXPRESSING THE BCL-2 PROTOONCOGENE IN TRANSGENIC MICE ARE PROTECTED FROM AXOTOMY-INDUCED CELL-DEATH
    DUBOISDAUPHIN, M
    FRANKOWSKI, H
    TSUJIMOTO, Y
    HUARTE, J
    MARTINOU, JC
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1994, 91 (08) : 3309 - 3313
  • [10] New members of the Bcl-2 family and their protein partners
    Farrow, SN
    Brown, R
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 6 (01) : 45 - 49