Slippery? Contradictory? Sociologically untenable? The Copenhagen school replies

被引：71

作者：

Buzan, B ^{[1
]}

Waever, O ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] COPENHAGEN PEACE RES INST,EUROPEAN SECUR GRP,COPENHAGEN,DENMARK

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S0260210597002416

中图分类号：

D81 [国际关系];

学科分类号：

030207 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：241 / 250

页数：10

共 21 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1994, Global society and international relations: Sociological concepts and political perspectives

[2]

BIGO D, IN PRESS DESORDRE EU

[3]

Bill McSweeney., 1996, REV INT STUD, V22, P81, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118467, DOI 10.1017/S0260210500118467]

BOOTH, K .

[5]

Buzan B., 1997, SECURITY NEW FRAMEWO

[6]

Connolly W., 1995, ETHOS PLURALIZATION

[7]

Connolly WilliamE., 1991, IDENTITYDIFFERENCE D

[8]

DERRIDA J, 1994, RADICAL PHILOS, V68, P41

[9]

Durkheim Emile, 1984, DIVISION LABOUR SOC, pxxvi

[10]

HANSEN B, 1995, EUROPEAN SECURITY 20, P222