Value and economic estimation model for grid-scale energy storage in monopoly power markets

被引:30
作者
Ding, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Yujie [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Haisheng [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Wenwen [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Shan [1 ]
Sun, Shuang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Engn Thermophys, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Grid-scale energy storage; Monopoly power market; Production cost model; Ancillary services; Economic analysis; China; ELECTRICITY MARKET; CHINA; FLOW; VIABILITY; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGIES; OPERATION; STRATEGY; INDUSTRY; POINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.063
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
080707 [能源环境工程]; 082001 [油气井工程];
摘要
Recent trend in increasing the penetration level of renewable energy challenges safety and stability of the power grid. Electrical energy storage (EES) has been deemed as one of the key elements needed to mitigate the fluctuant and intermittent nature of renewables, and is undergoing rapid development nowadays. However, there are still many questions regarding the benefits and drawbacks that EES technologies will present to society, as well as the economic feasibility of EES in monopoly power markets. Given this, this paper presents a grid-scale production cost model for monopoly power markets in which EES generates profits by offering both energy and ancillary services. The production costs of the power system with and without an EES power plant was compared in order to generate a value estimation. Results indicate that the value of EES is related to the unit fuel price and the start-up cost of thermal power units, the penetration level of wind power and size of the EES system. Based on these variables, a value-driven pricing mechanism for EES was put forward and compared with other policies. Economic viability analysis revealed that the pricing mechanism currently used in monopoly power markets are highly inaccurate in capturing the value generated by EES.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 1002
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]
Akhil AA, 2013, DOE EPRI ELECTRICITY
[2]
Transmission expansion planning: A mixed-integer LP approach [J].
Alguacil, N ;
Motto, AL ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (03) :1070-1077
[3]
[Anonymous], 2017, CALC METH INCL POLL
[4]
[Anonymous], 2016, 13 5 YEAR PLAN WIND
[5]
[Anonymous], 2017, MARK REP SER COAL 20
[6]
[Anonymous], 2010, ELECTRICITY ENERGY S
[7]
[Anonymous], 2017, PEOPL REP CHIN ENV P
[8]
PRACTICAL METHOD FOR THE DIRECT ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT STABILITY [J].
ATHAY, T ;
PODMORE, R ;
VIRMANI, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1979, 98 (02) :573-584
[9]
A review and probabilistic model of lifecycle costs of stationary batteries in multiple applications [J].
Battke, Benedikt ;
Schmidt, Tobias S. ;
Grosspietsch, David ;
Hoffmann, Volker H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 25 :240-250
[10]
Valuation of energy storage in energy and regulation markets [J].
Berrada, Asmae ;
Loudiyi, Khalid ;
Zorkani, Izeddine .
ENERGY, 2016, 115 :1109-1118