Bias against research on gender bias

被引:47
作者
Cislak, Aleksandra [1 ]
Formanowicz, Magdalena [2 ]
Saguy, Tamar [3 ]
机构
[1] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ, Psychol Dept, Torun, Poland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Psychol, Fabrikstr 8, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Interdisciplinary Ctr IDC Herzliya, Psychol Dept, Herzliyya, Israel
关键词
Impact factor; Gender-science stereotype; Gender discrimination; Bibliometric analysis; SCIENCE; RACE; JOURNALS; FACULTY; IMPACT; SEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-018-2667-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
080201 [机械制造及其自动化];
摘要
The bias against women in academia is a documented phenomenon that has had detrimental consequences, not only for women, but also for the quality of science. First, gender bias in academia affects female scientists, resulting in their underrepresentation in academic institutions, particularly in higher ranks. The second type of gender bias in science relates to some findings applying only to male participants, which produces biased knowledge. Here, we identify a third potentially powerful source of gender bias in academia: the bias against research on gender bias. In a bibliometric investigation covering a broad range of social sciences, we analyzed published articles on gender bias and race bias and established that articles on gender bias are funded less often and published in journals with a lower Impact Factor than articles on comparable instances of social discrimination. This result suggests the possibility of an underappreciation of the phenomenon of gender bias and related research within the academic community. Addressing this meta-bias is crucial for the further examination of gender inequality, which severely affects many women across the world.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 200
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing [J].
Blair, IV ;
Judd, CM ;
Chapleau, KM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (10) :674-679
[2]
Funding for qualitative research [J].
Carey, MA ;
Swanson, J .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (06) :852-856
[3]
Promoting Institutional Change Through Bias Literacy [J].
Carnes, Molly ;
Devine, Patricia G. ;
Isaac, Carol ;
Manwell, Linda Baier ;
Ford, Cecelia E. ;
Byars-Winston, Angela ;
Fine, Eve ;
Sheridan, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF DIVERSITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 5 (02) :63-77
[4]
Gender comparisons of social work faculty using H-Index scores [J].
Carter, T. Edison ;
Smith, Thomas E. ;
Osteen, Philip J. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 111 (03) :1547-1557
[5]
Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management [J].
Cho, Alyssa H. ;
Johnson, Shelly A. ;
Schuman, Carrie E. ;
Adler, Jennifer M. ;
Gonzalez, Oscar ;
Graves, Sarah J. ;
Huebner, Jana R. ;
Marchant, D. Blaine ;
Rifai, Sami W. ;
Skinner, Irina ;
Bruna, Emilio M. .
PEERJ, 2014, 2
[6]
Serious gaps: How the lack of sex/gender-based research impairs health [J].
Correa-De-Araujo, Rosaly .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 15 (10) :1116-1122
[7]
Gender and Perceptions of Occupational Prestige: Changes Over 20 [J].
Crawley, Donna .
SAGE OPEN, 2014, 4 (01)
[8]
Career prospects for female university researchers have not improved [J].
Danell, Rickard ;
Hjerm, Mikael .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (03) :999-1006
[9]
A gender bias habit-breaking intervention led to increased hiring of female faculty in STEMM departments [J].
Devine, Patricia G. ;
Forscher, Patrick S. ;
Cox, William T. L. ;
Kaatz, Anna ;
Sheridan, Jennifer ;
Carnes, Molly .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 73 :211-215