LOW DOSES OF FENOXAPROP-P-ETHYL CAUSE HORMESIS IN LITTLESEED CANARYGRASS AND WILD OAT

被引:22
作者
Abbas, T. [1 ]
Nadeem, M. A. [1 ]
Tanveer, A. [1 ]
Zohaib, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
关键词
Avena fatua; fenoxaprop-P-ethyl; growth stimulation; phalaris minor; ultra-low doses; STRESS; GROWTH; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582016340300013
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 [植物学];
摘要
Hormetic effects of herbicides at ultra-low doses have been proved against range of crop species, although available data of herbicides hormesis about the weeds growth is very limited. This study investigates the promotive effect of low doses of fenoxaprop-Pethyl on growth and seed production of littleseed canarygrass and wild oat. Pot experiments were conducted twice in Wire House at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, during 2014-15. Seven different concentrations of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl [0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 g a.i. ha(-1)] were applied as post emergence herbicide at 3-4 leaves stage of the weeds. Results revealed that increase in growth occurred within first two weeks after spraying at fenoxaprop-P-ethyl doses 1, 3 and 6 g a.i. ha(-1). More growth stimulation as compared to all other treatments was observed at fenoxaprop-P-ethyl dose 6 g a.i. ha(-1). This initial increase in growth sustains with time up to the maturity of both weeds and positively influences seeds production ability. Up to 28% and 17% increase in number of seeds per plants were occurred in littleseed canarygrass and wild oat, respectively. Doses above 6 g a.i. ha(-1) negatively affect the weeds growth and seed production ability.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 533
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Herbicide hormesis - can it be useful in crop production? [J].
Belz, R. G. ;
Cedergreen, N. ;
Duke, S. O. .
WEED RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (04) :321-332
[2]
Biological stress response terminology: Integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. ;
Bachmann, Kenneth A. ;
Bailer, A. John ;
Bolger, P. Michael ;
Borak, Jonathan ;
Cai, Lu ;
Cedergreen, Nina ;
Cherian, M. George ;
Chiueh, Chuang C. ;
Clarkson, Thomas W. ;
Cook, Ralph R. ;
Diamond, David M. ;
Doolittle, David J. ;
Dorato, Michael A. ;
Duke, Stephen O. ;
Feinendegen, Ludwig ;
Gardner, Donald E. ;
Hart, Ronald W. ;
Hastings, Kenneth L. ;
Hayes, A. Wallace ;
Hoffmann, George R. ;
Ives, John A. ;
Jaworowski, Zbigniew ;
Johnson, Thomas E. ;
Jonas, Wayne B. ;
Kaminski, Norbert E. ;
Keller, John G. ;
Klaunig, James E. ;
Knudsen, Thomas B. ;
Kozumbo, Walter J. ;
Lettleri, Teresa ;
Liu, Shu-Zheng ;
Maisseu, Andre ;
Maynard, Kenneth I. ;
Masoro, Edward J. ;
McClellan, Roger O. ;
Mehendale, Harlhara M. ;
Mothersill, Carmel ;
Newlin, David B. ;
Nigg, Herbert N. ;
Oehme, Frederick W. ;
Phalen, Robert F. ;
Philbert, Martin A. ;
Rattan, Suresh I. S. ;
Riviere, Jim E. ;
Rodricks, Joseph ;
Sapolsky, Robert M. ;
Scott, Bobby R. ;
Seymour, Colin ;
Sinclair, David A. .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 222 (01) :122-128
[3]
Hormesis and plant biology [J].
Calabrese, Edward J. ;
Blain, Robyn B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2009, 157 (01) :42-48
[4]
Improved empirical models describing hormesis [J].
Cedergreen, N ;
Ritz, C ;
Streibig, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2005, 24 (12) :3166-3172
[5]
Cedergreen Nina, 2007, Dose-Response, V5, P150, DOI 10.2203/dose-response.06-008.Cedergreen
[6]
Chemical stress can increase crop yield [J].
Cedergreen, Nina ;
Felby, Claus ;
Porter, John R. ;
Streibig, Jens C. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2009, 114 (01) :54-57
[7]
Herbicide risk assessment for non-target aquatic plants: sulfosulfuron - a case study [J].
Davies, J ;
Honegger, JL ;
Tencalla, FG ;
Meregalli, G ;
Brain, P ;
Newman, JR ;
Pitchford, HF .
PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 59 (02) :231-237
[8]
Duke S. O., 2006, Outlooks on Pest Management, V17, P29
[9]
Harrington J. T., 1994, Tree Planters' Notes, V45, P121
[10]
Biology and management of Phalaris minor in rice-wheat system [J].
Om, H ;
Kumar, S ;
Dhiman, SD .
CROP PROTECTION, 2004, 23 (12) :1157-1168