Mupirocin resistance after long-term use for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis

被引:128
作者
Pérez-Fontán, M
Rosales, M
Rodríguez-Carmona, N
Falcón, TG
Valdés, F
机构
[1] Hosp Juan Canalejo, Div Publ Hlth, Coruna, Spain
[2] Hosp Juan Canalejo, Div Nephrol, Coruna, Spain
关键词
Staphylococcus aureus (SAu); mupirocin (Mup); resistance; peritoneal dialysis (PD);
D O I
10.1053/ajkd.2002.30553
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mupirocin (Mup) has been used extensively to prevent Staphylococcus aureus (SAu) infections In patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Resistance to Mup has been reported, but its relevance after long-term use of this drug in PD is unknown. Colonization by SAu was treated with topic Mup in our unit between September 1990 and December 2000. Sensitivity to Mup was tested in 437 strains of SAu isolated from 155 PD patients and 62 dialysis partners. Resistance to Mup was classified as: low, (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] greater than or equal to 8 mug/mL) or high (MIC greater than or equal to 512 mug/mL) degree. MIC90 was 0.125 mug/ML in 1990 to 1996 (5% low, 0% high-degree resistance), 64 mug/mL in 1997 to 1998 (6.6% low, 8.3% high-degree resistance), and 1,024 mug/mL in 1999 to 2000 (2.3% low, 12.4% high-degree resistance). Mup-resistant SAu were isolated from 25 patients and 13 partners a median of 15 months after starting PD. Resistance was associated frequently with repeated treatments of SAu recolonization, but was detected in 3 cases at the start of PD therapy. The accumulated incidence of SAu exit-site infection in the period 1997 to 2000 was 32.3% in patients colonized by Mup-resistant SAu as compared with 14.5% in those colonized by Mup-sensitive SAu (P = 0.03). Mup-resistant SAu have emerged in a significant proportion of our PD patients and dialysis partners. This emergence has resulted in a moderate, but significant, increase in the risk of SAu exit-site infection and raises concerns about the future of Mup as the therapy of choice for SAu colonization in patients undergoing chronic PD. (C) 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 341
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A randomized trial of Staphylococcus aureus prophylaxis in peritoneal dialysis patients: Mupirocin calcium ointment 2% applied to the exit site versus cyclic oral rifampin [J].
Bernardini, J ;
Piraino, B ;
Holley, J ;
Johnston, JR ;
Lutes, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1996, 27 (05) :695-700
[2]   Clinical and economic effects of mupirocin calcium on preventing Staphylococcus aureus infection in hemodialysis patients: A decision analysis [J].
Bloom, BS ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Chernew, ME ;
Patel, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1996, 27 (05) :687-694
[3]  
BOELAERT JR, 1994, J CHEMOTHERAPY, V6, P19
[4]  
BRADLEY SF, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P354
[5]   MECHANISM OF MUPIROCIN TRANSPORT INTO SENSITIVE AND RESISTANT-BACTERIA [J].
CAPOBIANCO, JO ;
DORAN, CC ;
GOLDMAN, RC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 33 (02) :156-163
[6]  
Casey M, 2000, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V20, P566
[7]   The emergence of mupirocin resistance: a challenge to infection control and antibiotic prescribing practice [J].
Cookson, BD .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 41 (01) :11-18
[8]   MUPIROCIN RESISTANCE IN STAPHYLOCOCCI [J].
COOKSON, BD .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 25 (04) :497-501
[9]   Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic nasal mupirocin in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis based on a randomized, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Davey, P ;
Craig, AM ;
Hau, C ;
Malek, M .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 (01) :105-112
[10]   Mupirocin resistance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [J].
Eltringham, I .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1997, 35 (01) :1-8