Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists

被引:78
作者
Clarke, AC [1 ]
Chiragakis, L [1 ]
Hillman, LC [1 ]
Kaye, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] Brindabella Specialist Ctr, Mugga Wara Endoscopy Ctr, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04345.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the incidence of adverse events related to an endoscopy sedation regimen that included propofol, delivered by general practitioner (GP) sedationists. Design: Audit of reports of sedation-related adverse events in patients undergoing endoscopy. A sample of 1000 patients' medical records was also reviewed to determine the drugs and dosages used and the proportion of sedations delivered by GPs. Setting and participants: All patients undergoing gastroscopy and/or colonoscopy from January 1996 to December 2000 in two private endoscopy centres in Canberra. Sedation was provided by GPs or a specialist anaesthetist, in most cases using a drug regimen that included propofol. Main outcome measures: Incidences of respiratory arrest, airway obstruction, hypoxia requiring intervention, hypotension, and death; number of interventions to correct these events, including extra airway management, bag-mask ventilation, intravenous fluid infusion, endotracheal intubation and the use of reversal agents, and admission to hospital. Results: 28 472 procedures were performed in the five years. There were 185 sedation-related adverse events (6.5/1000 procedures; 95% Cl, 5.6-7.4): 107 for airway or ventilation problems (3.8/1000) and 77 hypotensive episodes (2.7/1000). Respiratory-related adverse events were more common in patients managed by GPs than anaesthetists, but this was not significant (P = 0.1). Interventions were recorded in 234 patients (8.2/1000; 95% Cl, 7.2-9.3): 123 to maintain ventilation, and 111 intravenous infusions. GPs were more likely than anaesthetists to intervene to manage respiratory-related adverse events (P = 0.03). Four patients required transfer or admission to hospital. No patients required endotracheal intubation, and there were no deaths. Conclusions: The GP sedationists encountered a low incidence of adverse events, which they managed effectively. It appears that appropriately selected and trained GPs can safely use propofol for sedation during endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 161
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
*ANZCA GASTR SOC A, 1997, SED END
[2]   Colonoscopy - Is sedation necessary and is there any role for intravenous propofol? [J].
Bell, GD ;
Charlton, JE .
ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (03) :264-267
[3]   MIDAZOLAM ACTS SYNERGISTICALLY WITH FENTANYL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA [J].
BENSHLOMO, I ;
ABDELKHALIM, H ;
EZRY, J ;
ZOHAR, S ;
TVERSKOY, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (01) :45-47
[4]  
*HLTH INS COMM, 2000, MED BEN SCHED GROUP
[5]   PROSPECTIVE AUDIT OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY IN 2 REGIONS OF ENGLAND - SAFETY, STAFFING, AND SEDATION METHODS [J].
QUINE, MA ;
BELL, GD ;
MCCLOY, RF ;
CHARLTON, JE ;
DEVLIN, HB ;
HOPKINS, A .
GUT, 1995, 36 (03) :462-467
[6]   Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies [J].
Reimann, FM ;
Samson, U ;
Derad, I ;
Fuchs, M ;
Schiefer, B ;
Stange, EF .
ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (03) :239-244
[7]   UPTAKE OF HALOTHANE BY HUMAN BODY [J].
SECHZER, PH ;
PRICE, HL ;
DRIPPS, RD ;
LINDE, HW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1963, 24 (6P1) :779-&
[8]   PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM ACT SYNERGISTICALLY IN COMBINATION [J].
SHORT, TG ;
CHUI, PT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (05) :539-545
[9]   Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study [J].
Wehrmann, T ;
Kokabpick, S ;
Lembcke, B ;
Caspary, WF ;
Seifert, H .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (06) :677-683