The effect of reducing the threshold for carbon monoxide validation of smoking abstinence - Evidence from the English Stop Smoking Services

被引:21
作者
Brose, Leonie S. [1 ,2 ]
Tombor, Ildiko [3 ]
Shahab, Lion [3 ]
West, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, NCSCT, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] UCL, London WC1E 7HB, England
[3] UCL, Canc Res UK Hlth Behaviour Res Ctr, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Smoking cessation; Outcome criteria; Carbon monoxide; Success rates; SMOKERS; NONSMOKERS; CESSATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.04.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction: The most commonly used threshold of expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) concentration to validate self-reported smoking abstinence is <10 parts per million (ppm). It has been proposed to reduce this threshold. This study examined what effect a reduction would have on short-term success rates in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 315,718 quit attempts supported by English NHS Stop Smoking Services were included in the analysis. The proportion of 4-week quits as determined by the Russell standard (<10 ppm) that also met lower thresholds was calculated for each unit change from <9 ppm to <2 ppm. Additionally, associations of established predictors with outcome were assessed in logistic regressions for selected thresholds. Results: At <10 ppm, 35% of quit attempts were regarded as successful. Differences for a single unit reduction increased with each reduction; small reductions had very little impact (e.g. <8 ppm: 34.7% success), but at <3 ppm, only 26.3% would still be regarded as successful. With the threshold reduced to <3 ppm established predictors of cessation showed a weaker association with outcome than with the threshold at <10 ppm suggesting an increase in error of outcome measurement. Conclusions: Reducing the threshold for expired-air CO concentration to validate abstinence would have a minimal effect on success rates unless the threshold were reduced substantially which would likely increase error of measurement. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2529 / 2531
页数:3
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LOC STOP SMOK SERV S
[2]   The effectiveness of NHS smoking cessation services: a systematic review [J].
Bauld, Linda ;
Bell, Kirsten ;
McCullough, Lucy ;
Richardson, Lindsay ;
Greaves, Lorraine .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 32 (01) :71-82
[3]   What makes for an effective stop-smoking service? [J].
Brose, Leonie S. ;
West, Robert ;
McDermott, Mairtin S. ;
Fidler, Jennifer A. ;
Croghan, Emma ;
McEwen, Andy .
THORAX, 2011, 66 (10) :924-926
[4]   Expired carbon monoxide levels in self-reported smokers and nonsmokers in prison [J].
Cropsey, Karen L. ;
Eldridge, Gloria D. ;
Weaver, Michael F. ;
Villalobos, Gabriela C. ;
Stitzer, Maxine L. .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (05) :653-659
[5]   The measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide in healthy smokers and non-smokers [J].
Deveci, SE ;
Deveci, F ;
Açik, Y ;
Ozan, AT .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 98 (06) :551-556
[6]   'The smoking toolkit study': a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England [J].
Fidler, Jennifer A. ;
Shahab, Lion ;
West, Oliver ;
Jarvis, Martin J. ;
McEwen, Andy ;
Stapleton, John A. ;
Vangeli, Eleni ;
West, Robert .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
[7]   COMPARISON OF TESTS USED TO DISTINGUISH SMOKERS FROM NONSMOKERS [J].
JARVIS, MJ ;
TUNSTALLPEDOE, H ;
FEYERABEND, C ;
VESEY, C ;
SALOOJEE, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1987, 77 (11) :1435-1438
[8]   Cut-off levels for breath carbon monoxide as a marker for cigarette smoking [J].
Javors, MA ;
Hatch, JP ;
Lamb, RJ .
ADDICTION, 2005, 100 (02) :159-167
[9]  
Low E. C. T., 2004, SMJ Singapore Medical Journal, V45, P578
[10]   Using breath carbon monoxide to validate self-reported tobacco smoking in remote Australian Indigenous communities [J].
MacLaren, David J. ;
Conigrave, Katherine M. ;
Robertson, Jan A. ;
Ivers, Rowena G. ;
Eades, Sandra ;
Clough, Alan R. .
POPULATION HEALTH METRICS, 2010, 8