Diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination and imaging tests for osteomyelitis underlying diabetic foot ulcers: Meta-analysis

被引:182
作者
Dinh, Marie T. [1 ]
Abad, Cybele L. [1 ]
Safdar, Nasia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Wm S Middleton VA Ctr, Dept Med,Sect Infect Dis, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/590011
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 [免疫学];
摘要
Accurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis underlying diabetic foot ulcers is essential to optimize outcomes. We undertook a meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for osteomyelitis in diabetic patients with foot ulcers. Pooled sensitivity and specificity, the summary measure of accuracy (Q(star)), and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated. Exposed bone or probe-to-bone test had a sensitivity of 0.60 and a specificity of 0.91. Plain radiography had a sensitivity of 0.54 and a specificity of 0.68. MRI had a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.79. Bone scan was found to have a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.28. Leukocyte scan was found to have a sensitivity of 0.74 and a specificity of 0.68. The diagnostic odds ratios for clinical examination, radiography, MRI, bone scan, and leukocyte scan were 49.45, 2.84, 24.36, 2.10, and 10.07, respectively. The presence of exposed bone or a positive probe-to-bone test result is moderately predictive of osteomyelitis. MRI is the most accurate imaging test for diagnosis of osteomyelitis.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 527
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[2]
Boulton A J, 2000, J Fam Pract, V49, pS3
[3]
The global burden of diabetic foot disease [J].
Boulton, AJM ;
Vileikyte, L ;
Ragnarson-Tennvall, G ;
Apelqvist, J .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9498) :1719-1724
[4]
Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in neuropathic foot ulcers [J].
Crerand, S ;
Dolan, M ;
Laing, P ;
Bird, M ;
Smith, ML ;
Klenerman, I .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (01) :51-55
[5]
Contribution of technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime labelled leucocyte scintigraphy to the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection [J].
Devillers, A ;
Moisan, A ;
Hennion, F ;
Garin, E ;
Poirier, JY ;
Bourguet, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 25 (02) :132-138
[6]
FOOT INFECTIONS IN DIABETIC-PATIENTS - DECISION AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES [J].
ECKMAN, MH ;
GREENFIELD, S ;
MACKEY, WC ;
WONG, JB ;
KAPLAN, S ;
SULLIVAN, L ;
DUKES, K ;
PAUKER, SG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (09) :712-720
[7]
Deep foot infections in patients with diabetes and foot ulcer: An entity with different characteristics, treatments, and prognosis [J].
Eneroth, M ;
Larsson, J ;
Apelqvist, J .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 1999, 13 (5-6) :254-263
[8]
The diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes: microbiological examination vs. magnetic resonance imaging and labelled leucocyte scanning [J].
Ertugrul, MB ;
Baktiroglu, S ;
Salman, S ;
Unal, S ;
Aksoy, M ;
Berberoglu, K ;
Calangu, S .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (06) :649-653
[9]
Fleiss J L, 1993, Stat Methods Med Res, V2, P121, DOI 10.1177/096228029300200202
[10]
The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance [J].
Glas, AS ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Prins, MH ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1129-1135