High Resolution DEM Generation in High-Alpine Terrain Using Airborne Remote Sensing Techniques

被引:34
作者
Buehler, Yves [1 ]
Marty, Mauro [2 ]
Ginzler, Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] WSL Inst Snow & Avalanche Res SLF, CH-7260 Davos, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Geog, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res Birmen, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
关键词
ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ELEVATION; MODEL; LIDAR; EXTRACTION; ERROR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01331.x
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Up-to-date and accurate digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential for many applications such as numerical modeling of mass movements or mapping of terrain changes. Today the Federal Department of Topography, swisstopo, provides Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) and Digital Surface Models (DSMs) derived from airborne LiDAR data with a high spatial resolution of 2 m covering the entire area of Switzerland below an elevation of 2000?m a.s.l.. However, above an elevation of 2000?m a.s.l., which is typical for high-alpine terrain, the best product available is the a DTM with a spatial resolution of 25?m. This spatial resolution is insufficient for many applications in complex terrain. In this study, we investigate the quality of DSMs derived from opto-electronic scanner data (ADS80; acquired in autumn 2010) using photogrammetric image correlation techniques based on the multispectral nadir and backward looking sensor data. As reference, we take a high precision airborne LiDAR data set with a spatial resolution of ca. 0.5?m, acquired in late summer 2010, covering the Grabengufer/Dorfbach catchment near Randa, VS. We find the deviations between the two datasets are surprisingly low. In terrain with inclination angles of less than 30 degrees the RMSE is below 0.5?m. In extremely steep terrain of more than 50 degrees the RMSE goes up to 2?m and outliers increase significantly. We also find dependencies of the deviations on illumination conditions and ground cover classes. Finally we discuss advantages and disadvantages of the different data acquisition methods.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 647
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Accuracy assessment of lidar-derived digital elevation models [J].
Aguilar, Fernando J. ;
Mills, Jon. P. .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC RECORD, 2008, 23 (122) :148-169
[2]   Modelling vertical error in LiDAR-derived digital elevation models [J].
Aguilar, Fernando J. ;
Mills, Jon P. ;
Delgado, Jorge ;
Aguilar, Manuel A. ;
Negreiros, J. G. ;
Perez, Jose L. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 65 (01) :103-110
[3]  
[Anonymous], PHOTOGRAMMETRIC WEEK
[4]   Automated detection and mapping of avalanche deposits using airborne optical remote sensing data [J].
Buehler, Y. ;
Hueni, A. ;
Christen, M. ;
Meister, R. ;
Kellenberger, T. .
COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 57 (2-3) :99-106
[5]  
Bühler Y, 2011, ANN GLACIOL, V52, P72, DOI 10.3189/172756411797252121
[6]   RAMMS: Numerical simulation of dense snow avalanches in three-dimensional terrain [J].
Christen, M. ;
Kowalski, J. ;
Bartelt, P. .
COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 63 (1-2) :1-14
[7]   Monitoring Topographic Changes in a Periglacial High-mountain Face using High-resolution DTMs, Monte Rosa East Face, Italian Alps [J].
Fischer, Luzia ;
Eisenbeiss, Henri ;
Kaab, Andreas ;
Huggel, Christian ;
Haeberli, Wilfried .
PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES, 2011, 22 (02) :140-152
[8]   Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models [J].
Fisher, Peter E. ;
Tate, Nicholas J. .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 30 (04) :467-489
[9]  
Grun A, 2007, P DREIL SGPBF DGPF O
[10]   Digital Photogrammetric Camera Evaluation - Generation of Digital Elevation Models [J].
Haala, Norbert ;
Hastedt, Heidi ;
Wolf, Kirsten ;
Ressl, Camillo ;
Baltrusch, Sven .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2010, (02) :99-115