Branch duct IPMTs: value of cross-sectional imaging in the assessment of biological behavior and follow-up

被引:39
作者
Carbognin, G
Zamboni, G
Pinali, L
Dalla Chiara, E
Girardi, V
Salvia, R
Mucelli, RP
机构
[1] Univ Hosp GB Rossi, Dept Radiol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp GB Rossi, Dept Surg, I-37134 Verona, Italy
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 2006年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
pancreas; cystic tumors; computed tomography; magnetic resonance cholangiography; pancreatic ducts; cysts; intraductal papillary mucinous tumor; follow-up;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-004-0127-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous tumors (IPMTs) are increasingly being described and represent a challenge for the physician. Recent imaging modalities, especially computed tomography and magnetic resonance, allow for a correct diagnosis, but IPMTs can manifest with different degrees of cellular atypia so it is very important to be able to establish the biological behavior of the lesion. Sixty-five patients were included in this study: 29 of them underwent surgery, and the other 36 were followed with cross-sectional imaging. Among patients who underwent surgery, 11 had benign lesions and 18 had malignant lesions. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the diagnosis of malignancy for all the cross-sectional imaging techniques were 61%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Among patients who were followed and had a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic diagnosis of branch duct IPMT with imaging features indicative of benignity, only two showed modifications over the follow-up period. Even considering some important biases (small number of patients and relatively short follow-up), interesting conclusions can be drawn: the imaging diagnosis of malignancy can be trusted, whereas that of benignity cannot be relied upon, but if the signs of malignancy are absent, the slow growth of the lesions justifies watchful follow-up in the correct clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 325
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Fernandez-del Castillo C, 2002, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V6, P660
  • [2] Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: Thin-section helical CT findings
    Fukukura, Y
    Fujiyoshi, F
    Sasaki, M
    Inoue, H
    Yonezawa, S
    Nakajo, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (02) : 441 - 447
  • [3] The natural history of the incidentally discovered small simple pancreatic cyst: Long-term follow-up and clinical implications
    Handrich, SJ
    Hough, DM
    Fletcher, JG
    Sarr, MG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (01) : 20 - 23
  • [4] Natural history of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of branch duct type - Follow-up study by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
    Irie, H
    Yoshimitsu, K
    Aibe, H
    Tajima, T
    Nishie, A
    Nakayama, T
    Kakihara, D
    Honda, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2004, 28 (01) : 117 - 122
  • [5] DUCTECTATIC MUCINOUS CYSTADENOMA AND CYSTADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS
    ITAI, Y
    OHHASHI, K
    NAGAI, H
    MURAKAMI, Y
    KOKUBO, T
    MAKITA, K
    OHTOMO, K
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 161 (03) : 697 - 700
  • [6] Lichtenstein D R, 1995, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V5, P237
  • [7] Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: Clinicopathologic features, outcome, and nomenclature
    Loftus, EV
    OlivaresPakzad, BA
    Batts, KP
    Adkins, MC
    Stephens, DH
    Sarr, MG
    Dimagno, EP
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (06) : 1909 - 1918
  • [8] Mucin-hypersecreting intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas: A precursor to cystic pancreatic malignancies
    Madura, JA
    Wiebke, EA
    Howard, TJ
    Cummings, OW
    Hull, MT
    Sherman, S
    Lehman, GA
    [J]. SURGERY, 1997, 122 (04) : 786 - 792
  • [9] Maruyama, 1982, PROG DIG ENDOSC, V20, P348
  • [10] Optimal management of the branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas
    Matsumoto, T
    Aramaki, M
    Yada, K
    Hirano, S
    Himeno, Y
    Shibata, K
    Kawano, K
    Kitano, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 36 (03) : 261 - 265