Comparative cross-over study of sildenafil and apomorphine for treating erectile dysfunction

被引:11
作者
Afif-Abdo, Joao [1 ]
Teloken, Claudio [2 ]
Damiao, Ronaldo [2 ]
Koff, Walter [2 ]
Wroclawski, Eric [2 ]
Yamasaki, Rui [2 ]
Torres, Luiz Otavio [2 ]
Sabaneeff, Jorge [2 ]
Faria, Geraldo [2 ]
Pompeo, Antonio Carlos [2 ]
Cortado, Pedro [2 ]
Glina, Sidney [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Cruz, Serv Urol, BR-04044060 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Serv Urol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
apomorphine; erectile dysfunction; sildenafil; preference; effectiveness;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07767.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness. safety and tolerability of sildenafil and apomorphine in Brazilian patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) of various causes. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 108 patients (mean age 55 years, SD 11) and documented ED for >= 6 months were included in 12 centres in Brazil. The patients were initially followed for 2 weeks and then randomized to initial treatment with apomorphine or sildenafil, taken before sexual intercourse, no more than once a day. The initial dose (2 mg apomorphine and 50 mg sildenafil) could be adjusted (to 3 mg apomorphine, or to 25 or 100 mg for sildenafil) depending on the effectiveness and tolerability during the first 4 weeks of treatment. The patients were re-evaluated after 8 weeks on treatment and, after a wash-out period of 2 weeks (no treatment), received the other study drug (other than that received in the first phase), and then had the same procedures as in the first phase. RESULTS In all, 97 patients were evaluated for therapeutic effectiveness, the overall effectiveness being assessed using two questions; sildenafil had a significantly higher proportion of affirmative answers for both (P< 0.001). Likewise, the estimates for the mean (SD) proportion of successful sexual intercourse, of 83.3 (4.7)% vs 40.3 (4.7)% and the total ED Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction score, of 86.7 (2.9) vs 56.9 (2.9) (P< 0.001) were higher for sildenafil. At the end of the study, 93.8% of the patients randomized to initial therapy with apomorphine declared a preference for sildenafil, and 81.3% of those initially treated with sildenafil declared a preference for that drug. The two drugs were well tolerated, and the main adverse events for apomorphine were nausea, vomiting, headache, taste perversion and dizziness; for sildenafil they were headache, flushing or vasodilatation, abdominal pain or dyspepsia and nasal congestion. CONCLUSIONS Sildenafil is more effective than apomorphine for treating ED, in the domains of erectile function, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and overall satisfaction, and was the drug preferred by most of the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 834
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Oral treatment of erectile dysfunction with apomorphine SL [J].
Altwein, JE ;
Keuler, FU .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2001, 67 (04) :257-263
[2]   PHYSIOLOGY OF PENILE ERECTION [J].
ANDERSSON, KE ;
WAGNER, G .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1995, 75 (01) :191-236
[3]  
BENET AE, 1995, UROL CLIN N AM, V22, P699
[4]  
BOOLELL M, 1996, INT J IMPORT RES, V8, P1397
[5]  
DROLLER MJ, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V270, P83
[6]   An open-label, randomized, flexible-dose, crossover study to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate and apomorphine hydrochloride in men with erectile dysfunction [J].
Eardley, I ;
Wright, P ;
Macdonagh, R ;
Hole, J ;
Edwards, A .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 93 (09) :1271-1275
[7]   Coronary artery risk factors in patients with erectile dysfunction [J].
El-Sakka, AI ;
Morsy, AM ;
Fagih, BI ;
Nassar, AH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (01) :251-254
[8]   Incidence of erectile dysfunction in Italian men with diabetes [J].
Fedele, D ;
Coscelli, C ;
Cucinotta, D ;
Forti, G ;
Santeusanio, F ;
Viaggi, S ;
Fiori, G ;
Velonà, T ;
Lavezzari, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (04) :1368-1371
[9]   IMPOTENCE AND ITS MEDICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CORRELATES - RESULTS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS MALE AGING STUDY [J].
FELDMAN, HA ;
GOLDSTEIN, I ;
HATZICHRISTOU, DG ;
KRANE, RJ ;
MCKINLAY, JB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01) :54-61
[10]   Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction - A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Fink, HA ;
Mac Donald, R ;
Rutks, IR ;
Nelson, DB ;
Wilt, TJ .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (12) :1349-1360