A randomized, double-blind comparison of single dose and divided multiple dose dolasetron for cisplatin induced emesis

被引:26
作者
Harman, GS
Omura, GA
Ryan, K
Hainsworth, JD
Cramer, MB
Hahne, WF
机构
[1] UNIV ALABAMA, UNIV HOSP, BIRMINGHAM, AL USA
[2] DAVID GRANT MED CTR, DEPT DEF HLTH CARE SERV REG 10, FAIRFIELD, CA USA
[3] CENTENNIAL MED CTR, SARAH CANNON CANC CTR, NASHVILLE, TN USA
[4] MARION MERRELL DOW INC, KANSAS CITY, MO USA
关键词
dolasetron; antiemetic; 5-HT3; antagonist;
D O I
10.1007/s002800050490
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Intravenous dolasetron has been shown to be an effective antiemetic agent in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Previous studies have suggested that 1.8 mg/kg is an optimal dose for achieving control of emesis and nausea. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous (IV) dose of dolasetron with an equal divided multiple dose. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of a single 1.8-mg/kg dose of dolasetron given 30 min prior to high-dose cisplatin (greater than or equal to 80 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy was compared with the same total amount of dolasetron administered in three separate doses (0.6 mg/kg each) over a 12-h interval commencing 30 min prior to beginning chemotherapy and ending 11.5 h later. Antiemetic efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared in 55 patients with various malignancies during the 24 h following the initiation of chemotherapy. The number of emetic episodes was the primary efficacy parameter. Results: A single IV dose of dolasetron was generally more effective than a multiple-dose regimen in all measures of efficacy. There was a larger proportion of complete responders in the single-dose group compared with the multiple-dose group (48% vs 23%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Compared with the multiple-dose group, patients who received a single dose of dolasetron had a significantly (P = 0.034) longer median time to the first emetic episode (10.1 h vs > 24 h, respectively). Overall, 53% of patients had either a complete response or a major response to dolasetron, and only 40% of the total patient population received escape antiemetic medication in the 24 h after cisplatin administration. Except for headache, adverse events were similar with both regimens and were generally of mild or moderate intensity; no serious adverse events occurred. Neither dolasetron treatment regimen was associated with any clinically important events, trends in laboratory variables, or differences in safety profile. Conclusions: single-dose dolasetron was well tolerated and effectively controlled emesis and nausea in patients who received highly emetogenic, high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. The greater antiemetic efficacy of a single prophylactic dose of dolasetron offers both convenience and potential cost savings, compared with a multiple-dose schedule of administration.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 328
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS - AN OVERVIEW OF THEIR PRESENT STATUS AND FUTURE POTENTIAL IN CANCER THERAPY-INDUCED EMESIS [J].
AAPRO, MS .
DRUGS, 1991, 42 (04) :551-568
[2]  
BERTOLI L, 1992, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V11, P395
[3]   CHARACTERIZATION OF THE NOVEL 5-HT3 ANTAGONISTS MDL-73147EF (DOLASETRON MESILATE) AND MDL-74156 IN NG108-15 NEUROBLASTOMA X GLIOMA-CELLS [J].
BOEIJINGA, PH ;
GALVAN, M ;
BARON, BM ;
DUDLEY, MW ;
SIEGEL, BW ;
SLONE, AL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 219 (01) :9-13
[4]   HUMAN DOLASETRON PHARMACOKINETICS .1. DISPOSITION FOLLOWING SINGLE-DOSE INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION TO NORMAL-MALE SUBJECTS [J].
BOXENBAUM, H ;
GILLESPIE, T ;
HECK, K ;
HAHNE, W .
BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 1992, 13 (09) :693-701
[5]   ACUTE ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DOLASETRON MESYLATE, A 5-HT3 ANTAGONISTS, IN CANCER-PATIENTS TREATED WITH CISPLATIN [J].
CONROY, T ;
CAPPELAERE, P ;
FABBRO, M ;
FAUSER, AA ;
SPLINTER, TAW ;
SPIELMANN, M ;
SCHNEIDER, M ;
CHEVALLIER, B ;
GOUPIL, A ;
CHAUVERGNE, J ;
FARGEOT, P ;
PREVOT, G ;
OGRADY, P ;
GREEN, D ;
HARDENBERG, J ;
BOYCE, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 17 (02) :97-102
[6]  
GALVAN M, 1992, BRIT J PHARMACOL, V107, pP449
[7]  
Galvan Martin, 1993, Drugs of the Future, V18, P506
[8]  
GRUNBERG SM, 1993, NEW ENGL J MED, V329, P1790
[9]  
HECK K, 1992, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V51, P186
[10]   TREATMENT OF CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED EMESIS IN THE 1990S - IMPACT OF THE 5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS [J].
HESKETH, PJ .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1994, 2 (05) :286-292