From Social Structural Factors to Perceptions of Relationship Quality and Loneliness: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study

被引:439
作者
Hawkley, Louise C. [1 ]
Hughes, Mary Elizabeth [2 ]
Waite, Linda J. [3 ]
Masi, Christopher M. [4 ]
Thisted, Ronald A. [5 ]
Cacioppo, John T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Sociol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Hlth Studies, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2008年 / 63卷 / 06期
关键词
Loneliness risk factors; Health; Chronic stress; Social network; Relationship quality;
D O I
10.1093/geronb/63.6.S375
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives. The objective of this study was to test a conceptual Model 01 loneliness in Which social structural factors are posited to operate through proximal factors to influence perceptions of relationship quality and loneliness. Methods. We used a population-based sample of 225 White, Black, and Hispanic men and women aged 50 through 68 from the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study to examine the extent to which associations between sociodemographic factors, and loneliness were explained by socioeconomic Status, physical health, social roles, stress exposure, and Ultimately by network size and subjective relationship quality. Results. Education and income were negatively associated with loneliness and explained racial/ethnic differences in loneliness. Being married largely explained the association between income and loneliness, with positive marital relationships offering the greatest degree of protection against loneliness. Independent risk factors lot loneliness included male gender, physical health symptoms. chronic work and/or social stress, small social network. lack of a spousal confidant, and poor-quality social relationships. Discussion. Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate the causal role of social structural allot proximal factors in explaining changes in loneliness.
引用
收藏
页码:S375 / S384
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Day-to-day dynamics of experience-cortisol associations in a population-based sample of older adults [J].
Adam, Emma K. ;
Hawkley, Louise C. ;
Kudielka, Brigitte M. ;
Cacioppo, John T. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (45) :17058-17063
[2]  
Adams J. P., 1989, Journal of Applied Gerontology, V8, P365, DOI [10.1177/073346488900800307, DOI 10.1177/073346488900800307]
[3]   SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND HEALTH - THE CHALLENGE OF THE GRADIENT [J].
ADLER, NE ;
BOYCE, T ;
CHESNEY, MA ;
COHEN, S ;
FOLKMAN, S ;
KAHN, RL ;
SYME, SL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (01) :15-24
[4]   LONELINESS AND ALCOHOL-ABUSE - A REVIEW OF EVIDENCES OF AN INTERPLAY [J].
AKERLIND, I ;
HORNQUIST, JO .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1992, 34 (04) :405-414
[5]  
[Anonymous], FAMILY THERAPY, DOI [10.1111/%28ISSN%291467-6427, DOI 10.1111/(ISSN)1467-6427]
[6]   Socioeconomic status, social support, age, and health [J].
Antonucci, TC ;
Ajrouch, KJ ;
Janevic, M .
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH IN INDUSTRIAL NATIONS: SOCIAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS, 1999, 896 :390-392
[7]   Socioeconomic status and chronic stress - Does stress account for SES effects on health? [J].
Baum, A ;
Garofalo, JP ;
Yali, AM .
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH IN INDUSTRIAL NATIONS: SOCIAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS, 1999, 896 :131-144
[8]  
Berkman L., 2000, Social Epidemiology, P137, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780195083316.003.0007, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4]
[9]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN LONELINESS [J].
BORYS, S ;
PERLMAN, D .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1985, 11 (01) :63-74
[10]   Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective [J].
Cacioppo, John T. ;
Hawkley, Louise C. ;
Ernst, John M. ;
Burleson, Mary ;
Berntson, Gary G. ;
Nouriani, Bita ;
Spiegel, David .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2006, 40 (06) :1054-1085