Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study

被引:178
作者
Valentin, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Capuzzo, Maurizia [3 ]
Guidet, Bertrand [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Moreno, Rui [7 ]
Metnitz, Barbara [8 ]
Bauer, Peter [8 ]
Metnitz, Philipp [9 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Emergency Med, Vienna, Austria
[2] Rudolfstiftung Hosp, Dept Med 2, Intens Care Unit, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Hosp Ferrara, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Ferrara, Italy
[4] INSERM, Unite Rech Epidemiol Syst Informat & Modelisat, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris 06, Fac Med, Paris, France
[6] Hop St Antoine, AP HP, Serv Reanimat Med, F-75571 Paris, France
[7] Hosp St Antonio dos Capuchos, Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent EPE, Dept Intens Care, Lisbon, Portugal
[8] Med Univ Vienna, Sect Med Stat, Vienna, Austria
[9] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Anaesthesiol & Gen Intens Care, Vienna, Austria
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2009年 / 338卷
关键词
MEDICATION ERRORS; EVENTS; WORKLOAD; SAFETY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.b814
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess on a multinational level the frequency, characteristics, contributing factors, and preventive measures of administration errors in parenteral medication in intensive care units. Design Observational, prospective, 24 hour cross sectional study with self reporting by staff. Setting 113 intensive care units in 27 countries. Participants 1328 adults in intensive care. Main outcome measures Number of errors; impact of errors; distribution of error characteristics; distribution of contributing and preventive factors. Results 861 errors affecting 441 patients were reported: 74.5 (95% confidence interval 69.5 to 79.4) events per 100 patient days. Three quarters of the errors were classified as errors of omission. Twelve patients (0.9% of the study population) experienced permanent harm or died because of medication errors at the administration stage. In a multiple logistic regression with patients as the unit of analysis, odds ratios for the occurrence of at least one parenteral medication error were raised for number of organ failures (odds ratio per increase of one organ failure: 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.34); use of any intravenous medication (yes v no: 2.73, 1.39 to 5.36); number of parenteral administrations (per increase of one parenteral administration: 1.06, 1.04 to 1.08); typical interventions in patients in intensive care (yes v no: 1.50, 1.14 to 1.96); larger intensive care unit (per increase of one bed: 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02); number of patients per nurse (per increase of one patient: 1.30, 1.03 to 1.64); and occupancy rate (per 10% increase: 1.03, 1.00 to 1.05). Odds ratios for the occurrence of parenteral medication errors were decreased for presence of basic monitoring (yes v no: 0.19, 0.07 to 0.49); an existing critical incident reporting system (yes v no: 0.69, 0.53 to 0.90); an established routine of checks at nurses' shift change (yes v no: 0.68, 0.52 to 0.90); and an increased ratio of patient turnover to the size of the unit (per increase of one patient: 0.73, 0.57 to 0.93). Conclusions Parenteral medication errors at the administration stage are common and a serious safety problem in intensive care units. With the increasing complexity of care in critically ill patients, organisational factors such as error reporting systems and routine checks can reduce the risk for such errors.
引用
收藏
页码:928 / 931
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, AM J HEALTH-SYST PH, V50, P305, DOI DOI 10.1093/AJHP/50.2.305
[2]   Evaluation of two methods for quality improvement in intensive care: Facilitated incident monitoring and retrospective medical chart review [J].
Beckmann, U ;
Bohringer, C ;
Carless, R ;
Gillies, DM ;
Runciman, WB ;
Wu, AW ;
Pronovost, P .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (04) :1006-1011
[3]   Human errors in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit:: a 1-year prospective study [J].
Bracco, D ;
Favre, JB ;
Bissonnette, B ;
Wasserfallen, JB ;
Revelly, JP ;
Ravussin, P ;
Chioléro, R .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (01) :137-145
[4]   Medication administration errors in adult patients in the ICU [J].
Calabrese, AD ;
Erstad, BL ;
Brandl, K ;
Barletta, JE ;
Kane, SL ;
Sherman, DS .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (10) :1592-1598
[5]   Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: A comparative study of intensive care and general care units [J].
Cullen, DJ ;
Sweitzer, BJ ;
Bates, DW ;
Burdick, E ;
Edmondson, A ;
Leape, LL .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (08) :1289-1297
[6]   A LOOK INTO THE NATURE AND CAUSES OF HUMAN ERRORS IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT [J].
DONCHIN, Y ;
GOPHER, D ;
OLIN, M ;
BADIHI, Y ;
BIESKY, M ;
SPRUNG, CL ;
PIZOV, R ;
COTEV, S .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (02) :294-300
[7]  
Fahimi Fanak, 2008, Aust Crit Care, V21, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.10.004
[8]   Medication errors involving continuously infused medications in a surgical intensive care unit [J].
Herout, PM ;
Erstad, BL .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (02) :428-432
[9]   The effect of workload on infection risk in critically ill patients [J].
Hugonnet, Stephane ;
Chevrolet, Jean-Claude ;
Pittet, Didier .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (01) :76-81
[10]   Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: Direct observation approach for detection [J].
Kopp, BJ ;
Erstad, BL ;
Allen, ME ;
Theodorou, AA ;
Priestley, G .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (02) :415-425