Social power and approach-related neural activity

被引:61
作者
Boksem, Maarten A. S. [1 ]
Smolders, Ruud [1 ]
De Cremer, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
power; EEG; asymmetry; approach; inhibition; FRONTAL CORTICAL ACTIVITY; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INHIBITION; ATTENTION; REWARD; ACTIVATION; PUNISHMENT; EMOTION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsp006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
It has been argued that power activates a general tendency to approach whereas powerlessness activates a tendency to inhibit. The assumption is that elevated power involves reward-rich environments, freedom and, as a consequence, triggers an approach-related motivational orientation and attention to rewards. In contrast, reduced power is associated with increased threat, punishment and social constraint and thereby activates inhibition-related motivation. Moreover, approach motivation has been found to be associated with increased relative left-sided frontal brain activity, while withdrawal motivation has been associated with increased right sided activations. We measured EEG activity while subjects engaged in a task priming either high or low social power. Results show that high social power is indeed associated with greater left-frontal brain activity compared to low social power, providing the first neural evidence for the theory that high power is associated with approach-related motivation. We propose a framework accounting for differences in both approach motivation and goal-directed behaviour associated with different levels of power.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 520
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity [J].
Amodio, DM ;
Shah, JY ;
Sigelman, J ;
Brazy, PC ;
Harmon-Jones, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 40 (02) :225-232
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, EMOTION ADAPTATION
[3]  
Berkowitz L., 1999, HDB COGNITION EMOTIO, P411
[4]   Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity [J].
Boksem, Maarten A. S. ;
Tops, Mattie ;
Wester, Anne E. ;
Meijman, Theo F. ;
Lorist, Monique M. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1101 :92-101
[5]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[6]   Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Shulman, GL .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) :201-215
[7]   APPROACH WITHDRAWAL AND CEREBRAL ASYMMETRY - EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION AND BRAIN PHYSIOLOGY .1. [J].
DAVIDSON, RJ ;
SARON, CD ;
SENULIS, JA ;
EKMAN, P ;
FRIESEN, WV .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (02) :330-341
[8]   The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style [J].
Davidson, RJ ;
Irwin, W .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1999, 3 (01) :11-21
[9]   Anxiety and attentional focusing: trait, state and hemispheric influences [J].
Derryberry, D ;
Reed, MA .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1998, 25 (04) :745-761
[10]   Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? [J].
Fink, GR ;
Halligan, PW ;
Marshall, JC ;
Frith, CD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Dolan, RJ .
NATURE, 1996, 382 (6592) :626-628