Spatial pattern of ecosystem function and ecosystem conservation

被引:8
作者
Guo, ZW [1 ]
Gan, YL [1 ]
Li, YM [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Integrated Management Pest Insects, Inst Zool, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
关键词
conservation; ecosystem; function; spatial pattern; variation-position effect; water retention;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-003-2911-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The spatial pattern of ecosystem function can affect ecosystem conservation, Ecosystem functions are often heterogeneous spatially due to physical and biological factors. We can influence ecosystem functions by changing the spatial patterns of the physical and biological elements of an ecosystem and regulating their combinations. The variation-position effect highlights a phenomenon resulting from the spatial pattern of ecosystem function. The effect shows that the identical variation of a factor may produce different effects on the overall situation when this variation occurs in a different spatial position. In a watershed of the Yangtze River, water retention is a primary ecosystem function. The variation-position effect for water retention capacity occurs in the watershed because of the spatial heterogeneity in vegetation, soil, and slope. The change of vegetation that occurs in a complex can affect the overall situation of water retention, and the effect can be different due to the change occurring in the position holding different vegetation-soil-slope complex. To improve the ecosystem in the watershed and to meet the social needs for the ecosystem function of water retention, a strategy called "ecosystem function and spatial pattern-based forest extension" was proposed to conserve forests. The implementation of the strategy enables the watershed to attain the maximum effective increase in water retention capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 692
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] A comparison of the enforcement of access restrictions between Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve (China) and Khao Yai National Park (Thailand)
    Albers, H
    Grinspoon, E
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 24 (04) : 351 - 362
  • [2] Bradshaw TK, 1998, RURAL SOCIOL, V63, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00662.x
  • [3] Cacha M. D. M., 1994, Protected area economics and policy: linking conservation and sustainable development., P151
  • [4] EVALUATING FIELD-BASED GIS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION, MODELING AND DECISION-SUPPORT
    CARVER, S
    HEYWOOD, I
    CORNELIUS, S
    SEAR, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1995, 9 (04): : 475 - 486
  • [5] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [6] COWEN DJ, 1995, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V61, P1393
  • [7] Daily G.C., 2013, NATURES SERVICES SOC, P454, DOI [10.12987/9780300188479-039/html, DOI 10.12987/9780300188479-039/HTML, 10.12987/9780300188479-039]
  • [8] De Groot RudolfS., 1992, FUNCTIONS NATURE EVA
  • [9] ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTIONS AS A UNIFYING CONCEPT FOR ECOLOGY AND ECONOMICS
    DEGROOT, RS
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTALIST, 1987, 7 (02): : 105 - 109
  • [10] Spatial economic valuation: Benefits transfer using geographical information systems
    Eade, JDO
    Moran, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 48 (02) : 97 - 110