Working with low back pain: workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time

被引:44
作者
Feuerstein, M
Berkowitz, SM
Haufler, AJ
Lopez, MS
Huang, GD
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Prevent Med & Biometr, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Div Behav Med, Washington, DC USA
[4] Dept Vet Affairs, VA Res & Dev Off, Cooperat Studies Program, Washington, DC USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Dept Kinesiol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[6] USA, Ctr Hlth Promot & Prevent Med, Ergon Program, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD USA
关键词
musculoskeletal; low back; pain; occupational stress; ergonomic exposure; lost time; limited duty; psychosocial; military personnel; secondary prevention;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.10000
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Few studies have identified the risk factors associated with lost time in employees working with occupational low back pain (OLBP) despite the presence of pain. Such data could assist in the development of evidenced-based secondary prevention programs. Methods The present investigation was a case-control study (n = 421) of demographic, health behavior, ergonomic, workplace and individual psychosocial factors hypothesized to be associated with lost time in young, MI-time employees (i.e., soldiers) with OLBP Analyses of the burden of OLBP in terms of the number of days on limited duty and lost time status were also computed. Results Logistic regression analysis indicated that female gender, education beyond HS/GED, longer time working in military, higher levels of daily life worries, no support from others, higher levels of ergonomic exposure, stressful work, increased peer cohesion, and greater perceived effort at work placed a worker at a greater likelihood for OLBP-related lost work time. Lower levels of innovation, involvement, and supervisor support were also associated with lost time. Linear regression indicated that the number of days of lost time and limited duty was associated with lower levels of physical health and higher levels of symptom severity. Conclusions The results support the potential utility of interventions targeting ergonomic, workplace and individual psychosocial risk factors in secondary prevention. Published 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc dagger.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 638
页数:12
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management [J].
Amick, BC ;
Habeck, RV ;
Hunt, A ;
Fossel, AH ;
Chapin, A ;
Keller, RB ;
Katz, JN .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2000, 10 (01) :21-38
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MANUAL SOCIAL PROBLE
[3]  
ASH P, 1995, B AM ACAD PSYCH LAW, V23, P205
[4]   The Quebec Task Force classification for spinal disorders and the severity, treatment, and outcomes of sciatica and lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Patrick, DL ;
Convery, K ;
Keller, RB ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) :2885-2892
[5]  
BARRON S, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P609
[6]   Occupational back disability in US Army personnel [J].
Berkowitz, SM ;
Feuerstein, M ;
Lopez, MS ;
Peck, CA .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 1999, 164 (06) :412-418
[7]   BACK INJURIES IN INDUSTRY - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY .2. INJURY FACTORS [J].
BIGOS, SJ ;
SPENGLER, DM ;
MARTIN, NA ;
ZEH, J ;
FISHER, L ;
NACHEMSON, A ;
WANG, MH .
SPINE, 1986, 11 (03) :246-251
[9]  
Borg G., 1998, BORGS PERCEIVED EXER, P104
[10]  
Butterfield PG, 1998, AM J IND MED, V34, P559, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199812)34:6<559::AID-AJIM3>3.3.CO