Effect of block-iterative acceleration on Ga-67 tumor detection in thoracic SPECT

被引:23
作者
Gifford, HC [1 ]
King, MA
Narayanan, MV
Pretorius, PH
Smyczynski, MS
Wells, RG
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
关键词
image quality assessment; iterative reconstruction; observer studies; single-photon; tumor detection;
D O I
10.1109/TNS.2002.998680
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A combination of human localization receiver operating characteristic (LROC) and channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) ROC psychophysical studies were used to investigate how accelerated ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and rescaled block-iterative (RBI) EM reconstruction affect tumor detection in simulated Ga-67 SPECT images. The tumors were 1-cm-diameter spheres within the chest region of the three-dimensional mathematical cardiac-torso phantom. Previous work with iterative detector resolution compensation showed that eight iterations of the OSEM algorithm with a subset size of eight (16 subsets) offered optimal observer performance. For the LROC study in this paper, the OSEM and RBI algorithms were implemented using subset sizes P and iterations K that satisfied the relation P = K for P = 1, 2. 4, and S. The CHO was applied to reconstruction strategies that deviated from this relation. Results show that using P less than or equal to 2 penalized observer performance compared to strategies with larger subset sizes. Other researchers have reported on the more stable convergence and noise properties of the RBI algorithm [(Byrne, 1996) and (Lalush and Tsui, 2000)]. In a similar vein, we found that an RBI strategy with a subset size of P produced the same performance as an OSEM strategy with subset size 2P. As neither algorithm displayed a decisive advantage in speed over the other, we conclude that the RBI algorithm is the better choice for accelerating the Ga-67 reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 55
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers [J].
Abbey, CK ;
Barrett, HH ;
Eckstein, MP .
PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING - MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3032 :182-194
[2]   Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm. [J].
Abbey, CK ;
Barrett, HH ;
Wilson, DW .
IMAGE PERCEPTION - MEDICAL IMAGING 1996, 1996, 2712 :47-58
[3]   NOISE PROPERTIES OF THE EM ALGORITHM .1. THEORY [J].
BARRETT, HH ;
WILSON, DW ;
TSUI, BMW .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (05) :833-846
[4]   OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY - EFFECTS OF QUANTUM NOISE AND OBJECT VARIABILITY [J].
BARRETT, HH .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1990, 7 (07) :1266-1278
[5]  
Bartold SP, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P990
[6]   Block-iterative methods for image reconstruction from projections [J].
Byrne, CL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (05) :792-794
[7]  
Gaskill J.D., 1978, Linear Systems, Fourier Transforms, and Optics
[8]   A comparison of human observer LROC and numerical observer ROC for tumor detection in SPECT images [J].
Gifford, HC ;
Wells, RG ;
King, MA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1999, 46 (04) :1032-1037
[9]   LROC analysis of detector-response compensation in SPECT [J].
Gifford, HC ;
King, MA ;
Wells, RG ;
Hawkins, WG ;
Narayanan, MV ;
Pretorius, PH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (05) :463-473
[10]  
Gifford HC, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P514