Efficacy and safety of dexanabinol in severe traumatic brain injury: results of a phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

被引:207
作者
Maas, AIR [1 ]
Murray, G
Henney, H
Kassem, N
Legrand, V
Mangelus, M
Muizelaar, JP
Stocchetti, N
Knoller, N
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Neurosurg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Pharmos Corp, Iselin, NJ USA
[4] Quintiles, Paris, France
[5] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Neurosurg, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[6] Univ Milan, Neurosci ICU, Osped Policlin IRCCS, Milan, Italy
[7] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70253-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death and disability. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of dexanabinol, a synthetic cannabinoid analogue devoid of psychotropic activity, in severe traumatic brain injury. Methods 861 patients with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to 86 specialist centres from 15 countries were included in a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Patients were randomised to receive a single intravenous 150 mg dose of dexanabinol or placebo within 6 h of injury. The primary outcome was the extended Glasgow outcome scale assessed at 6 months, with the point of dichotomisation into unfavourable versus favourable outcome differentiated by baseline prognostic risk. Prespecified subgroup analyses were defined by injury severity, recruitment rate, and time to dosing. Secondary analysis included control of intracranial pressure and quality of life. Analysis were prespecified in the protocol and the statistical analysis plan. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00129857. Findings 846 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The extended Glasgow outcome scale at 6 months did not differ between groups; 215 (50%) patients in the dexanabinol group and 214 (51%) patients in the placebo group had an unfavourable outcome (odds ratio for a favourable response 1.04; 95% CI 0.79-1.36). Improvements in the control of intracranial pressure or quality of life were not recorded and subgroup analysis showed no indication of differential treatment effects. Dexanabinol was not associated with hepatic, renal, or cardiac toxic effects. Interpretation Dexanabinol is safe, but is not efficacious in the treatment of traumatic brain injury.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Bolland K, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2835, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981230)17:24<2835::AID-SIM933>3.3.CO
  • [2] 2-#
  • [3] Pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia and brain trauma: Similarities and differences
    Bramlett, HM
    Dietrich, WD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 2004, 24 (02) : 133 - 150
  • [4] Brewster ME, 1997, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V35, P361
  • [5] The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: A review
    Bruns, TJ
    Hauser, WA
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2003, 44 : 2 - 10
  • [6] Bullock RM, 2000, J NEUROTRAUM, V17, P449
  • [7] Lack of effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury.
    Clifton, GL
    Miller, ER
    Choi, SC
    Levin, HS
    McCauley, S
    Smith, KR
    Muizelaar, JP
    Wagner, FC
    Marion, DW
    Luerssen, TG
    Chesnut, RM
    Schwartz, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (08) : 556 - 563
  • [8] Collin C, 1988, Int Disabil Stud, V10, P61
  • [9] Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies
    Dickinson, K
    Bunn, F
    Wentz, R
    Edwards, P
    Roberts, I
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7245): : 1308 - 1311