Comparative analysis of flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

被引:118
作者
Neale, GAM
Coustan-Smith, E
Stow, P
Pan, Q
Chen, X
Pui, CH
Campana, D
机构
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[2] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Pathol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
acute lymphoblastic leukemia; minimal residual disease; flow cytometry; polymerase chain reaction;
D O I
10.1038/sj.leu.2403348
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an independent prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The most widely applied MRD assays in ALL are flow cytometric identification of leukemia immunophenotypes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of antigen-receptor genes. We measured MRD by both assays in 227 patients with childhood B-lineage ALL. Of 1375 samples (736 bone marrow and 639 peripheral blood) examined, MRD was <0.01% in 1200, and >= 0.01% in 129 by both assays; MRD levels measured by the two methods correlated well. Of the remaining 46 samples, 28 had MRD >= 0.01% by flow cytometry but <0.01% by PCR. However, PCR (which had a consistent sensitivity of 0.001%) detected leukemic gene rearrangements in 26 of these 28 samples. Conversely, in 18 samples, MRD was greater than or equal to0.01% by PCR but <0.01% by flow cytometry. In nine of these samples, flow cytometry had a sensitivity of 0.001%, and detected aberrant immunophenotypes in eight samples. Therefore, the two most widely used methods for MRD detection in ALL yield concordant results in the vast majority of cases, although the estimated levels of MRD may vary in some. The use of the two methods in tandem ensures MRD monitoring in all patients.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 938
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AUBIN J, 1995, LEUKEMIA, V9, P471
[2]   Minimal residual disease (MRD) status prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a powerful predictor for post-transplant outcome in children with ALL [J].
Bader, P ;
Hancock, J ;
Kreyenberg, H ;
Goulden, NJ ;
Niethammer, D ;
Oakhill, A ;
Steward, CG ;
Handgretinger, R ;
Beck, JF ;
Klingebiel, T .
LEUKEMIA, 2002, 16 (09) :1668-1672
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF CLONAL EVOLUTION AT IG/TCR LOCI IN ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA BY SINGLE-STRAND CONFORMATION POLYMORPHISM STUDIES AND HIGHLY RESOLUTIVE PCR DERIVED METHODS - IMPLICATION FOR A GENERAL STRATEGY OF MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE DETECTION [J].
BARUCHEL, A ;
CAYUELA, JM ;
MACINTYRE, E ;
BERGER, R ;
SIGAUX, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1995, 90 (01) :85-93
[4]   ANALYSIS OF IG AND T-CELL RECEPTOR GENES IN 40 CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIAS AT DIAGNOSIS AND SUBSEQUENT RELAPSE - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DETECTION OF MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE BY POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION ANALYSIS [J].
BEISHUIZEN, A ;
VERHOEVEN, MAJ ;
VANWERING, ER ;
HAHLEN, K ;
HOOIJKAAS, H ;
VANDONGEN, JJM .
BLOOD, 1994, 83 (08) :2238-2247
[5]   OUTCOME PREDICTION IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA BY MOLECULAR QUANTIFICATION OF RESIDUAL DISEASE AT THE END OF INDUCTION [J].
BRISCO, MJ ;
CONDON, J ;
HUGHES, E ;
NEOH, SH ;
SYKES, PJ ;
SESHADRI, R ;
TOOGOOD, I ;
WATERS, K ;
TAURO, G ;
EKERT, H ;
MORLEY, AA .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8891) :196-200
[6]   Determination of minimal residual disease in leukaemia patients [J].
Campana, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2003, 121 (06) :823-838
[7]  
Campana D, 1999, CYTOMETRY, V38, P139, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19990815)38:4<139::AID-CYTO1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-H
[9]   Advances in the immunological monitoring of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [J].
Campana, D ;
Coustan-Smith, E .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) :1-19
[10]   Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [J].
Cavé, H ;
ten Bosch, JV ;
Suciu, S ;
Guidal, C ;
Waterkeyn, C ;
Otten, J ;
Bakkus, M ;
Thielemans, K ;
Grandchamp, B ;
Vilmer, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (09) :591-598