Estimated Risk of Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer From Mammographic Screening for Young BRCA Mutation Carriers

被引:82
作者
Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy [1 ]
Berg, Christine D. [2 ]
Visvanathan, Kala [1 ]
Robson, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] NCI, Early Detect Res Grp, Canc Prevent Div, Rockville, MD USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Clin Genet & Breast Canc Med Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2009年 / 101卷 / 03期
关键词
IONIZING-RADIATION; X-RAYS; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; WOMEN; MRI; UK;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djn440
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BRCA mutation carriers are recommended to start mammographic screening for breast cancer as early as age 25-30 years. We used an excess relative risk model (based on a pooled analysis of three cohorts with 7600 subjects who received radiation exposure) to estimate the lifetime risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from five annual mammographic screenings in young (< 40 years) BRCA mutation carriers. We then estimated the reduction in breast cancer mortality required to outweigh the radiation risk. Breast cancer rates for mutation carriers were based on a pooled analysis of 22 pedigree studies with 8139 subjects. For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the estimated lifetime risk of radiation-induced breast cancer mortality per 10 000 women resulting from annual mammography was 26 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14 to 49) for screening at age 25-29 years, 20 (95% CI = 11 to 39) for screening at age 30-34 years, and 13 (95% CI = 7 to 23) for screening at age 35-39 years. To outweigh these risks, screening would have to reduce breast cancer mortality by 51% (95% CI = 27% to 96%) at age 25-29 years, by 12% (95% CI = 6% to 23%) at age 30-34 years, and by 4% (95% CI = 2% to 7%) at age 35-39 years; estimates were similar for BRCA2 mutation carriers. If we assume that the mortality reduction from mammography is 15%-25% or less for young women, these results suggest that there would be no net benefit from annual mammographic screening of BRCA mutation carriers at age 25-29 years; the net benefit would be zero or small at age 30-34 years, but there should be some net benefit at age 35 or older. These results depend on a number of assumptions due to the absence of empiric data. The impact of varying these assumptions was therefore examined.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Effect of chest x-rays on the risk of breast cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study:: A report from the EMBRACE, GENEPSO, GEO-HEBON, and IBCCS Collaborators' Group [J].
Andrieu, Nadine ;
Easton, Douglas F. ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Rookus, Matti A. ;
Brohet, Richard ;
Cardis, Elisabeth ;
Antoniou, Antonis C. ;
Wagner, Teresa ;
Simard, Jacques ;
Evans, Gareth ;
Peock, Susan ;
Fricker, Jean-Pierre ;
Nogues, Catherine ;
Van't Veer, Laura ;
Van Leeuwen, Flora E. ;
Goldgar, David E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (21) :3361-3366
[2]
[Anonymous], surveillance epidemiology and end results
[3]
Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[4]
FREQUENT CHEST-X-RAY FLUOROSCOPY AND BREAST-CANCER INCIDENCE AMONG TUBERCULOSIS PATIENTS IN MASSACHUSETTS [J].
BOICE, JD ;
PRESTON, D ;
DAVIS, FG ;
MONSON, RR .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1991, 125 (02) :214-222
[5]
Gene-environment interaction and aetiology of cancer: what does it mean and how can we measure it? [J].
Brennan, P .
CARCINOGENESIS, 2002, 23 (03) :381-387
[6]
Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Doll, R ;
Goodhead, DT ;
Hall, EJ ;
Land, CE ;
Little, JB ;
Lubin, JH ;
Preston, DL ;
Preston, RJ ;
Puskin, JS ;
Ron, E ;
Sachs, RK ;
Samet, JM ;
Setlow, RB ;
Zaider, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) :13761-13766
[7]
Identification of women with an increased risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer: a case only study [J].
Broeks, Annegien ;
Braaf, Linde M. ;
Huseinovic, Angelina ;
Nooijen, Anke ;
Urbanus, Jos ;
Hogervorst, Frans B. L. ;
Schmidt, Marjanka K. ;
Klijn, Jan G. M. ;
Russell, Nicola S. ;
Van Leeuwen, Flora E. ;
Van 't Veer, Laura J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (02)
[8]
Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK:: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits [J].
de González, AB ;
Reeves, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (05) :590-596
[9]
*DEC INC, 2006, CRYST BALL 7 2 2
[10]
The "NICE Guideline" on the treatment of depression [J].
Goldberg, D .
EPIDEMIOLOGIA E PSICHIATRIA SOCIALE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2006, 15 (01) :11-15