Winter wheat and prose millet yield reduction due to sunflower in rotation

被引:40
作者
Nielsen, DC [1 ]
Anderson, RL [1 ]
Bowman, RA [1 ]
Aiken, RM [1 ]
Vigil, MF [1 ]
Benjamin, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Cent Great Plains Res Stn, Akron, CO 80720 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE | 1999年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jpa1999.0193
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Producers wishing to diversify crop production systems from the traditional winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-fallow system of the central Great Plains need information regarding the impact of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) on subsequent winter wheat end prose millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) yields. This study was conducted to quantify winter wheat and prose millet yield reductions due to the lower available soil water that exists when sunflower is the prior crop in rotation. Eight crop rotations-including combinations of winter wheat (W), prose millet (M), corn (Zea mays L.) (C), sunflower (Sun), and fallow (F)-were established in 1990 and evaluated for yield, available soil water at planting, and crop water use in 1995, 1996, and 1997. The experiment was conducted at Akron, CO, on a Weld silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Aridic Paleustoll). Available soil water at wheat and millet planting was lower where sunflower had been the previous crop than where sunflower was not the previous crop. In dry years, rotations with sunflower as the previous crop had lower wheat and millet water use than other rotations, but averaged over 3 yr, there was no effect of sunflower on wheat or millet water use. Average wheat yield in a W-Sun-F rotation was about 30% lower than wheat yield from W-C-Sun-F, W-M-Sun-F, W-C-F, and W-F. Average millet yield in a M-Sun rotation was 43% lower than millet yield from M-W-C. Wheat yield declined by 178.5 lb/acre (3 bu/acre) for each inch decline in available soil water at planting. Millet yield declined by 295.6 lb/acre for each inch decline in available soil water at planting. In making the decision to include sunflower in crop rotations, producers will have to consider impact on subsequent crop yields, as well as costs of production, market value of crop, impact on pest problems, and total productivity of all crops in the rotation.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 197
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains [J].
Anderson, RL ;
Bowman, RA ;
Nielsen, DC ;
Vigil, MF ;
Aiken, RM ;
Benjamin, JG .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1999, 12 (01) :95-99
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SUNFLOWER TECHNOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR35.C4
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SUNFLOWER TECHNOLOGY
[4]   Crop rotation and tillage effects on phosphorus distribution in the central Great Plains [J].
Bowman, RA ;
Halvorson, AD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1997, 61 (05) :1418-1422
[5]   EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN AND DATA MANAGEMENT OF ROTATION EXPERIMENTS [J].
CADY, FB .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (01) :50-56
[6]  
Gomez K.A., 1984, Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research
[7]   NITROGEN-FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS IN AN ANNUAL DRYLAND CROPPING SYSTEM [J].
HALVORSON, AD ;
REULE, CA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (02) :315-318
[8]  
HALVORSON AD, 1994, P GREAT PLAINS SOIL, V5, P6
[9]   COMPARATIVE WATER-USE CHARACTERISTICS OF 6 ROW CROPS [J].
HATTENDORF, MJ ;
REDELFS, MS ;
AMOS, B ;
STONE, LR ;
GWIN, RE .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1988, 80 (01) :80-85
[10]   ROOTING DEPTH AND DRY-MATTER DEVELOPMENT OF SUNFLOWER [J].
JAAFAR, MN ;
STONE, LR ;
GOODRUM, DE .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (02) :281-286