FIBS in archaeobotany: Functional interpretation of weed floras in relation to husbandry practices

被引:51
作者
Charles, M [1 ]
Jones, G [1 ]
Hodgson, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SHEFFIELD, DEPT ANIM & PLANT SCI, UNIT COMPARAT PLANT ECOL, SHEFFIELD S10 2TN, S YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
关键词
archaeobotany; weed ecology; fibs; functional attributes; irrigation;
D O I
10.1006/jasc.1997.0194
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The application of ''FIBS'' (Functional Interpretation of Botanical Surveys) to the interpretation of archaeobotanical weed floras, as evidence of past husbandry practices, is explored. To illustrate the potential of the approach, present-day cereal fields in N. Spain are analysed in terms of the functional attributes of the weed species represented in dry-farmed and irrigated fields. Functional attributes are identified which relate in predictable ways to the quality of plant growth and the severity of drought. These attributes are successful in discriminating dry-farmed and irrigated fields. This investigation opens up the way for more general application of the method in the archaeobotanical study of crop husbandry. FIBS (a) permits the ''translation'' of ecological information from one group of species to another, via functional attributes, and (b) through an understanding of the ecological processes involved, provides a potential mechanism for reconstructing extinct agricultural regimes for which modern analogues do not exist. This presents an alternative to the traditional use of ecological indices (which are open to circularity of interpretation) or phytosociological groupings (for which there may not have been exact parallels in the past). The relevance of particular functional attributes to husbandry methods other than irrigation now needs to be explored in order to develop the methodology for general application to archaeobotanical weed assemblages. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1161
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   RELATING WET AND DRY YEAR ECOPHYSIOLOGY TO LEAF STRUCTURE IN CONTRASTING TEMPERATE TREE SPECIES [J].
ABRAMS, MD ;
KUBISKE, ME ;
MOSTOLLER, SA .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (01) :123-133
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   Stomatal density as an indicator of atmospheric CO2 concentration [J].
Beerling, David J. ;
Chaloner, William G. .
HOLOCENE, 1992, 2 (01) :71-78
[4]  
Behre K. E, 1991, PROGR OLD WORLD PALA, P81
[5]  
BENNETT M D, 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, V178, P277
[6]  
Bidwell R.G.S., 1974, Plant physiology
[7]  
Binford LewisR., 1981, Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths
[8]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF LEAF THICKNESS AMONG SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN HARDWOODS [J].
CARPENTER, SB ;
SMITH, ND .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1981, 59 (08) :1393-1396
[9]   RESOURCE AVAILABILITY AND PLANT ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE [J].
COLEY, PD ;
BRYANT, JP ;
CHAPIN, FS .
SCIENCE, 1985, 230 (4728) :895-899
[10]   IMPORTANCE OF CELL-SIZE IN WATER RELATIONS OF PLANTS [J].
CUTLER, JM ;
RAINS, DW ;
LOOMIS, RS .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1977, 40 (04) :255-260