Efficacy of treating low back pain and dysfunction secondary to osteoarthritis: Chiropractic care compared with moist heat alone

被引:29
作者
Beyerman, KL [1 ]
Palmerino, MB
Zohn, LE
Kane, GM
Foster, KA
机构
[1] Winchester Hosp, Community Hlth Inst, Winchester, MA 01890 USA
[2] Ctr Strategy Res, Holden, MA USA
[3] Winchester Hosp Chiropract Ctr, Winchester, MA USA
关键词
osteoarthritis; spine; lumbar; vertebrae; chiropractic;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.10.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of chiropractic spinal manipulation, Manual flexion/distraction, and hot pack application for the treatment of low back pain from osteoarthritis (OA) compared with moist heat alone. Methods: Two hundred fifty-two patients with low back pain secondary to OA were randomly assigned to either the treatment group (moist hot pack plus Chiropractic care) or the moist heat group Subjects, which attended 20 treatment sessions over several weeks. At sessions 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20, they rated pain Using a Visual analog pain scale, activities of daily living using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, and a range of motion (ROM) using the J-Tech Dual Digital Inclinometer (JTECH Medical Model no. AA036). Results: Session I ratings indicated that the two groups were equivalent oil all pain and flexion scores. The treatment group reported greater and more rapid pain reduction and greater and more rapid ROM improvement than the moist heat group. The treatment group also had greater improvements than the moist heat group in daily living activities in 4 of the 9 areas measured. Conclusion: Chiropractic care combined with heat is more effective than heat alone for treating OA-based lower back pain. Pain reduction occurs more rapidly and to a greater degree, and ROM increases more rapidly and to a greater degree.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 114
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain [J].
Bijur, PE ;
Silver, W ;
Gallagher, EJ .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (12) :1153-1157
[2]  
CHIARELLO CM, 1993, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V74, P32
[3]   The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: Intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale [J].
DeLoach, LJ ;
Higgins, MS ;
Caplan, AB ;
Stiff, JL .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (01) :102-106
[4]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[5]   Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED [J].
Gallagher, EJ ;
Bijur, PE ;
Latimer, C ;
Silver, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 20 (04) :287-290
[6]   Chronic spinal pain syndromes:: A clinical pilot trial comparing acupuncture, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and spinal manipulation [J].
Giles, LGF ;
Müller, R .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 22 (06) :376-381
[7]  
HSIEH CYJ, 1994, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V17, P353
[8]   Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? [J].
Kelly, AM .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (11) :1086-1090
[9]  
KIRKALDYWILLIS WH, 1978, MANAGING LOW BACK PA, P175
[10]   Use of complementary therapies for arthritis among patients of rheumatologists [J].
Rao, JK ;
Mihaliak, K ;
Kroenke, K ;
Bradley, J ;
Tierney, WM ;
Weinberger, M .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 131 (06) :409-416