Social exclusion in Britain 1991-1995

被引:228
作者
Burchardt, T [1 ]
Le Grand, J [1 ]
Piachaud, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Ctr Anal Social Exclus, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
social exclusion; poverty; panel data;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9515.00148
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to offer a working definition of social exclusion and to operationalize it in such a way that an initial empirical analysis of social exclusion in Britain today can be undertaken. After a brief review of conceptions of social exclusion and some of the key controversies, we operationalize one definition based on the notion of participation in five types of activity-consumption, savings, production, political and social. Using the British Household Panel Survey, indicators for participation on these dimensions are developed and analysed both cross-sectionally and longitudinally for the period 1991-5 We find strong associations between an individual's participation (or lack of it) on the five different dimensions, and on each dimension over time. However, there is no distinct group of socially excluded individuals: few are excluded on all dimensions in any one year and even fewer experience multiple exclusion for the whole period. The results support the view that treating different dimensions of exclusion separately is preferable to thinking about social exclusion in terms of one homogeneous group.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 244
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ABRAHAMSON P, 1996, POVERTY EUROPEAN UNI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1974, LES EXCLUS
[3]  
[Anonymous], CM3805
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 12 CASE LOND SCH EC
[5]  
ATKINSON AB, 1998, 4 CASE LOND SCH EC
[6]  
BERGHMAN J, 1995, THRESHOLD
[7]  
BERGHMAN J, 1994, SEM MEAS AN SOC EXCL
[8]  
Commins P., 1993, Combating exclusion in Ireland 1990-1994: A midway report
[9]  
Duffy K., 1997, REV INT DIMENSION TH
[10]   Behind the rhetoric - The institutional basis of social exclusion and poverty [J].
Evans, M .
IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1998, 29 (01) :42-+