Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making

被引:82
作者
Makropoulos, CK [1 ]
Butler, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
multi-criteria spatial decision support; ordered weighted averaging; spatially variable risk perception; suitability evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.10.010
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The paper discusses a decomposition-analysis-aggregation approach to multi-criteria spatial decision-making and proposes a novel aggregation method applicable to problems of the object-location or suitability for application type, concentrating on methodological rather than software development aspects. The approach allows the decision maker to: (a) break the problem down into a series of elementary (easier to understand) problems, (b) analyse them (in the broad sense of the word), and then (c) produce an answer for the complex problem by aggregating the answers derived for the elementary problems. The choice of methodology used for this aggregation is very important as different aggregating techniques may yield different results to the (same) original problem. The method presented here, which is in effect an extension of the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) method into a spatial decision-making technique, is termed spatial ordered weighted averaging (SO WA). The main advantage of the method proposed is the incorporation of spatially variable attitude to risk into the decision-making process. The mathematical background of the method and an example of its application in urban water management are presented and discussed. The authors suggest that the method could be useful as an analytical and decision-making too] for the incorporation of spatially variable risk perception in GIS-based decision support systems. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 84
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, J. Geogr. Inf. Decis. Anal, DOI DOI 10.2134/JEQ2010.0365
[2]  
ARAUJO CC, 2002, NATURAL RESOURCES RE, V11, P29
[3]   A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty [J].
Bender, MJ ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :35-44
[4]   INTEGRATING MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION WITH GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEMS [J].
CARVER, SJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1991, 5 (03) :321-339
[5]  
Cooper N., 2000, URBAN WATER, V2, P97, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00047-9
[6]   Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources [J].
Despic, O ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :11-33
[7]   Application of a spatial decision support system (SDSS) to reduce soil erosion in northern Ethiopia [J].
Dragan, M ;
Feoli, E ;
Fernetti, M ;
Zerihun, W .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2003, 18 (10) :861-868
[8]   A new approach for directing proactive sewer maintenance [J].
Fenner, RA ;
Sweeting, L ;
Marriott, MJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MARITIME AND ENERGY, 2000, 142 (02) :67-77
[9]   On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights [J].
Filev, D ;
Yager, RR .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 94 (02) :157-169
[10]  
MAKROPOULOS C, 2004, J CHART INST WATER E, V18, P29