Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples

被引:97
作者
Berrens, RP [1 ]
Bohara, AK
Jenkins-Smith, HC
Silva, CL
Weimer, DL
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Econ, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, George Bush Sch Govt & Publ Serv, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Robert M La Follette Sch Publ Affairs, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
global climate change; Internet surveys; Kyoto Protocol; national referendum;
D O I
10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00094-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This contingent valuation study investigates the issues of information access and respondent effort, and is based on a series of national Internet samples. The focus is oil a split-sample treatment, Basic Information (BI) versus Enhanced Information (EI). In the latter, significantly expanded information is provided about global climate change and the Kyoto Protocol. Using a referendum format, we compare the treatment effect (BI versus EI) on willingness to pay (WTP). We develop measures of respondent effort in accessing optional information, through the technology of Web-based surveys, and jointly model effort and WTP using a simultaneous estimation approach. Results support the use of the joint modeling approach for objective measures of respondent effort and WTP. Respondent effort is shown to be positively and significantly related to WTP. However, use of the optional menu is rather modest (counts of pages and time spent), and is highly variable (both across pages and respondents). (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 363
页数:33
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*AAPOR, 1998, STAND DEF FIN DISP C
[2]  
[Anonymous], VALUING ENV PREFEREN
[3]  
Arrow K., 1993, FED REGISTER, V58, P4602
[4]  
Bergstrom J. C., 1990, Leisure Sciences, V12, P265, DOI 10.1080/01490409009513106
[5]   The advent of Internet surveys for political research: A comparison of telephone and Internet samples [J].
Berrens, RP ;
Bohara, AK ;
Jenkins-Smith, H ;
Silva, C ;
Weimer, DL .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 11 (01) :1-22
[6]   Further investigation of voluntary contribution contingent valuation: Fair share, time of contribution, and respondent uncertainty [J].
Berrens, RP ;
Jenkins-Smith, H ;
Bohara, AK ;
Silva, CL .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 44 (01) :144-168
[7]   Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation [J].
Blomquist, GC ;
Whitehead, JC .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1998, 20 (02) :179-196
[8]   Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: Open ended vs dichotomous choice [J].
Bohara, AK ;
McKee, M ;
Berrens, RP ;
Jenkins-Smith, H ;
Silva, CL ;
Brookshire, DS .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 35 (02) :142-163
[9]   Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good? [J].
Brown, TC ;
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
McCollum, DW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (02) :152-166
[10]   EFFICIENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR CLOSED-ENDED CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
JAMES, MD .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1987, 69 (02) :269-276