Comparison between 24-h proteinuria, urinary protein/creatinine ratio and dipstick test in patients with nephropathy: Patterns of proteinuria in dipstick-negative patients

被引:21
作者
Gai, M.
Motta, D.
Giunti, S.
Fop, F.
Masini, S.
Mezza, E.
Segoloni, G. P.
Lanfranco, G.
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Molinette Mauriziano Hosp, Lab Neprhol, IT-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Molinette Mauriziano Hosp, Nephrol Unit, IT-10126 Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Molinette Mauriziano Hosp, Dept Internal Med, IT-10126 Turin, Italy
关键词
dipstick test; 24-h proteinuria; laboratory methods; nephropathy; proteinuria; urinary protein/creatinine ratio;
D O I
10.1080/00365510600608563
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective. Three main tests are commonly employed for the measurement of proteinuria: the dipstick test, the urinary protein/creatinine ratio (P/C) and the 24-h urine collection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between these methods, comparing linear regression and ROC curve data. Material and methods. A total of 297 consecutive outpatients with different renal diseases were included in the study. Twenty-four-hour proteinuria was considered the reference test. Results. A high degree of correlation was observed between all the tests (p < 0.0001), the highest regression coefficient being between 24-h proteinuria and P/C (R=0.82), and the lowest between P/C and the dipstick test (R=0.72). The dipstick test failed to detect pathological proteinuria in 94 patients (31.6%). Therefore, in these subjects, the patterns of proteinuria were assessed by immunofixation and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) electrophoresis. Conclusions. Our data strongly support the use of urinary P/C for the detection of proteinuria, at least in nephrology units, where the prevalence of proteinuria is likely to be high.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 307
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Pathophysiology of proteinuria [J].
D'Amico, G ;
Bazzi, C .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 63 (03) :809-825
[2]   Proteinuria and interstitial injury [J].
Eddy, AA .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 19 (02) :277-281
[3]  
European Confederation of Laboratory Medicine, 2000, SCAND J CLIN LAB I S, V231, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/00365513.2000.12056993
[4]   Proteinuria dipstick test: Is it time to change? [J].
Gai, M ;
Motta, D ;
Cantaluppi, V ;
Fop, F ;
Jeantet, A ;
Segoloni, GP ;
Piccoli, GB ;
Lanfranco, G .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 64 (06) :2326-2327
[5]   A simple method for the classification of proteinuria [J].
Gai, M ;
Motta, D ;
Bertinetto, F ;
Mezza, E ;
Jeantet, A ;
Cantaluppi, V ;
Piccoli, GB ;
Lanfranco, G .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2003, 41 (08) :1097-1098
[6]   USE OF SINGLE VOIDED URINE SAMPLES TO ESTIMATE QUANTITATIVE PROTEINURIA [J].
GINSBERG, JM ;
CHANG, BS ;
MATARESE, RA ;
GARELLA, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (25) :1543-1546
[7]   Screening dipstick urinalysis: A time to change [J].
Kaplan, RE ;
Springate, JE ;
Feld, LG .
PEDIATRICS, 1997, 100 (06) :919-921
[8]   The urine test strip of the future [J].
Kutter, D .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2000, 297 (1-2) :297-304
[9]   Dry chemistry urinalysis of pathological proteinuria [J].
Kutter, D .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1998, 36 (12) :929-933
[10]  
LEMANN J, 1987, CLIN CHEM, V33, P297