Quantitative assessment of clinical signs for the detection of classical swine fever outbreaks during an epidemic

被引:31
作者
Elbers, ARW
Bouma, A
Stegeman, JA
机构
[1] ANim Hlth Serv, Epidemiol Unit, NL-7400 AA Deventer, Netherlands
[2] Inst Anim Sci & Hlth, ID Lelystad, Sect Quantitat Vet Epidemiol, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Farm Anim Hlth, NL-3508 TD Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
classical swine fever; diagnosis; clinical signs; sensitivity; specificity; receiver operating characteristic curve;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00519-3
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The performance of clinical signs as a diagnostic test for the detection of classical swine fever (CSF) outbreaks during the 1997-1998 CSF epidemic in The Netherlands was evaluated by constructing and analysing a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. This curve assesses the discriminating ability of a diagnostic test over a range of test signals. The cut-off values for a defined diagnostic test to detect CSF outbreaks were set by different combinations of clinical signs observed. The area under the ROC curve, which is a quantitative measure of test performance, was significantly (P < 0.001) larger than the area under the random ROC curve. This indicates that clinical signs have a significantly higher performance as a diagnostic test for the detection of CSF than for flipping a coin. However, the gain in diagnostic performance compared to a random process is not as much as we would wish it to be. The optimal efficient diagnostic test combined a sensitivity of 72.7% with a specificity of 52.7%, with a combination of the following clinical signs: unsteady gait/ataxia, not eating, not reacting to antibiotic treatment. conjunctivitis, hard faecal pellets. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 332
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluation of diagnostic tests for the detection of classical swine fever in the field without a gold standard [J].
Bouma, A ;
Stegeman, JA ;
Engel, B ;
de Kluijver, EP ;
Elbers, ARW ;
De Jong, MCM .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2001, 13 (05) :383-388
[2]   A REVIEW ON CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER INFECTIONS IN PIGS - EPIZOOTIOLOGY, CLINICAL-DISEASE AND PATHOLOGY [J].
DAHLE, J ;
LIESS, B .
COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1992, 15 (03) :203-211
[3]   Influence of breed-related factors on the course of classical swine fever virus infection [J].
Depner, KR ;
Hinrichs, U ;
Bickhardt, K ;
GreiserWilke, I ;
Pohlenz, J ;
Moennig, V ;
Liess, B .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1997, 140 (19) :506-507
[4]  
EICH KO, 1984, HDB SCHWEINE KRANKHE, P56
[5]  
Elbers ARW, 2000, VET REC, V147, P311
[6]   The classical swine fever epidemic 1997-1998 in the Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology [J].
Elbers, ARW ;
Stegeman, A ;
Moser, H ;
Ekker, HM ;
Smak, JA ;
Pluimers, FH .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1999, 42 (3-4) :157-184
[7]   Epidemiology of classical swine fever in Germany in the 1990s [J].
Fritzemeier, J ;
Teuffert, J ;
Greiser-Wilke, I ;
Staubach, C ;
Schlüter, H ;
Moennig, V .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 77 (1-2) :29-41
[8]  
Gresham A, 2000, VET REC, V147, P115
[9]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]   CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER AND ITS DIAGNOSIS - A CURRENT VIEW [J].
HARKNESS, JW .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1985, 116 (11) :288-293