Application of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAXA®) and determination of suitable cut-off values during primary screening in specific health check-ups in Japan

被引:14
作者
Nakatoh, Shinichi [1 ]
Takemaru, Yuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Asahi Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Toyama 9390741, Japan
[2] Asahimachi Hlth Ctr, Toyama 9390746, Japan
关键词
Osteoporosis; FRAX (R); cut-off values; Osteoporosis screening; Specific health check-ups;
D O I
10.1007/s00774-013-0457-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Specific health check-ups, which do not include osteoporosis screening, are conducted more frequently than periodic osteoporosis screening in Japan. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(A (R))) during specific health check-ups, evaluated the variations in its usefulness for 2 consecutive years, and determined FRAX(A (R)) cut-off values for osteoporosis screening. FRAX(A (R)) questionnaires were distributed to subjects who underwent specific health check-ups in 2009 and 2010 at Asahi-machi. Subjects who exhibited FRAX(A (R)) cut-off values of a parts per thousand yen10 % were advised to be screened at a medical institution. Bone mineral densities (BMDs) were measured in 201 subjects in 2009 and 105 subjects in 2010 after specific health check-ups, and treatment was initiated for 79 subjects in 2009 and 24 subjects in 2010. The number of subjects examined and the rate of treatment initiation following specific health check-ups were higher than those in subjects following periodic osteoporosis screening in 2009. However, the number and the rate following specific health check-ups dropped in 2010. According to receiver operating characteristic curves analyses, the sensitivity and specificity of FRAX(A (R)) to determine osteoporosis treatment were highest when the cut-off values were 8 % for men and 10.5 % for women. In conclusion, the combination of FRAX(A (R)) and specific health check-ups was more useful than periodic osteoporosis screening to narrow down the subjects and to motivate them to seek follow-up. Cut-off values for specific health check-up using FRAX(A (R)) should be approximately 8 % for men and 10.5 % for women.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 680
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX™) [J].
Fujiwara, S. ;
Nakamura, T. ;
Orimo, H. ;
Hosoi, T. ;
Gorai, I. ;
Oden, A. ;
Johansson, H. ;
Kanis, J. A. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (04) :429-435
[2]
Nationwide one-decade survey of hip fractures in Japan [J].
Hagino, Hiroshi ;
Sakamoto, Keizo ;
Harada, Atsushi ;
Nakamura, Toshitaka ;
Mutoh, Yoshiteru ;
Mori, Satoshi ;
Endo, Naoto ;
Nakano, Tetsuo ;
Itoi, Eiji ;
Kita, Kiyoshi ;
Yamamoto, Noriaki ;
Aoyagi, Kiyoshi ;
Yamazaki, Kaoru .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2010, 15 (06) :737-745
[3]
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [J].
Kanis, J. A. ;
Burlet, N. ;
Cooper, C. ;
Delmas, P. D. ;
Reginster, J. -Y. ;
Borgstrom, F. ;
Rizzoli, R. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (04) :399-428
[4]
Development and use of FRAXA® in osteoporosis [J].
Kanis, J. A. ;
McCloskey, E. V. ;
Johansson, H. ;
Oden, A. ;
Stroem, O. ;
Borgstroem, F. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 :407-413
[5]
Nakatoh Shinichi, 2009, Clin Calcium, V19, P1756, DOI CliCa091217561767
[6]
Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Nelson, HD ;
Helfand, M ;
Woolf, SH ;
Allan, JD .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (06) :529-541
[7]
Screening for Osteoporosis: An Update for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Nelson, Heidi D. ;
Haney, Elizabeth M. ;
Dana, Tracy ;
Bougatsos, Christina ;
Chou, Roger .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 153 (02) :99-W43
[8]
Orimo H, 2001, J BONE MINER METAB, V19, P331, DOI 10.1007/s007740170001
[9]
Orimo H, 2006, LIFE SCI
[10]
The utility and limitations of FRAX: A us perspective [J].
Silverman S.L. ;
Calderon A.D. .
Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2010, 8 (4) :192-197