Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcome of Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Gradient and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

被引:100
作者
Ozkan, Alper
Hachamovitch, Rory
Kapadia, Samir R.
Tuzcu, E. Murat
Marwick, Thomas H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Menzies Res Inst Tasmania, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
关键词
aortic stenosis; aortic valve; treatment outcome; PARADOXICAL LOW-FLOW; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; PREDICTORS; AFTERLOAD; DIAGNOSIS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001094
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background The optimal management of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient <40 mm Hg, indexed aortic valve area 0.6 cm(2)/m(2)) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remains controversial because gradients may be similar after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We compared outcomes of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with AVR or medical therapy. Methods and Results Comprehensive echocardiographic measurements including hemodynamic calculations were completed in 260 prospectively identified patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Patients were followed up for mortality over 28 +/- 24 months. AVR was performed in 123 patients (47%). Compared with AVR patients, medically treated patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (25% versus 41%, P=0.009), lower stroke volume index (36.4 +/- 8.4 versus 34.4 +/- 8.7 mL/m(2), P=0.02), higher pulmonary artery pressure (38 +/- 11 versus 48 +/- 21 mm Hg, P=0.001), and higher creatinine level (1.1 +/- 0.4 versus 1.22 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, P=0.02). These and other clinically relevant variables were entered into a propensity model that reflected likelihood of referral to AVR. This score and other variables were entered into a Cox model to explore the independent effect of AVR on outcome. During follow-up, 105 patients died (40%): 32 (30%) in the AVR group and 73 (70%) in the medical treatment group. AVR (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.94; P<0.001) was independently associated with outcome and remained a strong predictor of survival after adjustment for propensity score. Medical therapy was associated with 2-fold greater all-cause mortality than AVR. The protective effect of AVR was similar in 125 patients with normal flow (stroke volume index >35 mL/m(2); P=0.22). Conclusions AVR is associated with better survival than medical therapy in patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 631
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
American College of Cardiology, 2006, J Am Coll Cardiol, V48, pe1, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.021
[2]
Barasch E, 2008, J HEART VALVE DIS, V17, P81
[3]
Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice [J].
Baumgartner, Helmut ;
Hung, Judy ;
Bermejo, Javier ;
Chambers, John B. ;
Evangelista, Arturo ;
Griffin, Brian P. ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Otto, Catherine M. ;
Pellikka, Patricia A. ;
Quinones, Miguel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 10 (01) :1-25
[4]
Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis - Implications for diagnosis and treatment [J].
Briand, M ;
Dumesnil, JG ;
Kadem, L ;
Tongue, AG ;
Rieu, R ;
Garcia, D ;
Pibarot, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (02) :291-298
[5]
Outcome of Patients With Aortic Stenosis, Small Valve Area, and Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Despite Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [J].
Clavel, Marie-Annick ;
Dumesnil, Jean G. ;
Capoulade, Romain ;
Mathieu, Patrick ;
Senechal, Mario ;
Pibarot, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (14) :1259-1267
[6]
Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment [J].
Dumesnil, Jean G. ;
Pibarot, Philippe ;
Carabello, Blase .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :281-289
[7]
Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity - A new index based on the energy loss concept [J].
Garcia, D ;
Pibarot, P ;
Dumesnil, JG ;
Sakr, F ;
Durand, LG .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (07) :765-771
[8]
Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival [J].
Hachicha, Zeineb ;
Dumesnil, Jean G. ;
Bogaty, Peter ;
Pibarot, Philippe .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (22) :2856-2864
[9]
A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe:: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease [J].
Iung, B ;
Baron, G ;
Butchart, EG ;
Delahaye, F ;
Gohlke-Bärwolf, C ;
Levang, OW ;
Tornos, P ;
Vanoverschelde, JL ;
Vermeer, F ;
Boersma, E ;
Ravaud, P ;
Vahanian, A .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (13) :1231-1243
[10]
Outcome of Patients With Low-Gradient "Severe" Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction [J].
Jander, Nikolaus ;
Minners, Jan ;
Holme, Ingar ;
Gerdts, Eva ;
Boman, Kurt ;
Brudi, Philippe ;
Chambers, John B. ;
Egstrup, Kenneth ;
Kesaniemi, Y. Antero ;
Malbecq, William ;
Nienaber, Christoph A. ;
Ray, Simon ;
Rossebo, Anne ;
Pedersen, Terje R. ;
Skjaerpe, Terje ;
Willenheimer, Ronnie ;
Wachtell, Kristian ;
Neumann, Franz-Josef ;
Gohlke-Baerwolf, Christa .
CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (08) :887-895