An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory

被引:108
作者
Curran, Tim [1 ]
Tanaka, James W. [2 ]
Weiskopf, Daniel M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Oberlin Coll, Oberlin, OH 44074 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.3758/CABN.2.1.1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Object categorization emphasizes the similarities that bind exemplars into categories, whereas recognition memory emphasizes the specific identification of previously encountered exemplars. Mathematical modeling has highlighted similarities in the computational requirements of these tasks, but neuropsychological research has suggested that categorization and recognition may depend on separate brain systems. Following training with families of novel visual shapes (blobs), event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during both categorization and recognition tasks. ERPs related to early visual processing (N1, 156-200 msec) were sensitive to category membership. Middle latency ERPs (FN400 effects, 300-500 msec) were sensitive to both category membership and old/new differences. Later ERPs (parietal effects, 400-800msec) were primarily affected by old/new differences. Thus, there was a temporal transition so that earlier processes were more sensitive to categorical discrimination and later processes were more sensitive to recognition-related discrimination. Aspects of these results are consistent with both mathematical modeling and neuropsychological perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Separate memory-related processing for auditory frequency and patterns [J].
Alain, C ;
Achim, A ;
Woods, DL .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 36 (06) :737-744
[2]   Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection [J].
Allan, K ;
Wilding, EL ;
Rugg, MD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1998, 98 (2-3) :231-252
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, OX PSYCH S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MEM SYST
[5]   Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms [J].
Bentin, S ;
Deouell, LY .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 17 (1-3) :35-54
[6]   Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans [J].
Bentin, S ;
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
Perez, E ;
McCarthy, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) :551-565
[7]   A THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE AVERAGE REFERENCE IN TOPOGRAPHIC EVOKED-POTENTIAL STUDIES [J].
BERTRAND, O ;
PERRIN, F ;
PERNIER, J .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (06) :462-464
[8]   AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) ANALYSIS OF SEMANTIC CONGRUITY AND REPETITION EFFECTS IN SENTENCES [J].
BESSON, M ;
KUTAS, M ;
VANPETTEN, C .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 4 (02) :132-149
[9]   SCALP TOPOGRAPHY AND ANALYSIS OF INTRACRANIAL SOURCES OF FACE-EVOKED POTENTIALS [J].
BOTZEL, K ;
SCHULZE, S ;
STODIECK, SRG .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 104 (01) :135-143
[10]   FALSE-RECOGNITION REVERSAL - WHEN SIMILARITY IS DISTINCTIVE [J].
BRAINERD, CJ ;
REYNA, VF ;
KNEER, R .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (02) :157-185