PET changes management and improves prognostic stratification in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer: Results of a multicenter prospective study

被引:65
作者
Scott, Andrew M. [1 ]
Gunawardana, Dishan H. [1 ]
Kelley, Ben [2 ]
Stuckey, John G. [3 ]
Byrne, Amanda J. [1 ]
Ramshaw, Jayne E. [4 ]
Fulham, Michael J. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hosp, Ctr PET, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Wesley Hosp, So Xray Clin, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Monash Med Ctr, MIA, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Australian & New Zealand Assoc Phys Nucl Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept PET & Nucl Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Sch Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
molecular imaging; oncology; PET/CT; PET; colorectal cancer; management change;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.108.051615
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aims of our study were to examine the impact of PET in changing management in patients with proven or suspected colorectal cancer recurrence and to assess the impact of management change on disease-free survival. Methods: Symptomatic patients with a residual structural lesion suggestive of recurrent tumor (group A) or patients with pulmonary or hepatic metastases considered to be potentially resectable (group B) underwent PET scans. Pre-PET management plans were documented by referring clinicians unaware of the PET results, and follow-up to 12 mo was performed to determine actual management and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 191 patients (118 men and 73 women; mean age, 66 y) were studied. PET detected additional sites of disease in 48.4% of patients in group A and in 43.9% of patients in group B. A change in planned management was documented in 65.6% of group A and in 49.0% of group B patients. These management plans were implemented in 96% of patients. Follow-up data in group A showed progressive disease in 60.5% of patients with additional lesions detected by PET, compared with conventional imaging, and in 36.2% of patients with no additional lesions detected by PET (P = 0.04). In group B, progressive disease was identified in 65.9% of patients with additional lesions detected by PET and in 39.2% of patients with no additional lesions detected by PET (P = 0.01). PET also provided valuable prognostic information on patients stratified into curative- or palliative-intent groups. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the significant impact of PET on management and outcomes in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1457
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*AIHW, 2004, CANC SER AIHW, V28
[2]  
Akhurst T, 1999, SEMIN ONCOL, V26, P577
[3]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2006, CANC FACTS FIG 2006
[4]   Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis - Meta-analysis [J].
Bipat, S ;
van Leeuwen, MS ;
Comans, EFI ;
Pijl, MEJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Stoker, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) :123-131
[5]   Five-year survival after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients screened by positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) [J].
Fernandez, FG ;
Drebin, JA ;
Linehan, DC ;
Dehdashti, F ;
Siegel, BA ;
Strasberg, SM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (03) :438-447
[6]   Additional value of whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in recurrent colorectal cancer [J].
Flamen, P ;
Stroobants, S ;
Van Cutsem, E ;
Dupont, P ;
Bormans, G ;
De Vadder, N ;
Penninckx, F ;
Van Hoe, L ;
Mortelmans, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) :894-901
[7]   Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer - Analysis of 1001 consecutive cases [J].
Fong, Y ;
Fortner, J ;
Sun, RL ;
Brennan, MF ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :309-318
[8]   Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: Strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection [J].
Goldberg, RM ;
Fleming, TR ;
Tangen, CM ;
Moertel, CG ;
Macdonald, JS ;
Haller, DG ;
Laurie, JA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 129 (01) :27-+
[9]   Intensive surveillance after stage II or III colorectal cancer: Is it worth it? [J].
Goldberg, RM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (03) :330-331
[10]   Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: Initial results from the national oncologic PET registry [J].
Hillner, Bruce E. ;
Siegel, Barry A. ;
Liu, Dawei ;
Shields, Anthony F. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Hanna, Lucy ;
Stine, Sharon Hartson ;
Coleman, R. Edward .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (13) :2155-2161