Conservation of freshwater biodiversity:: a comparison of different area selection methods

被引:63
作者
Abellán, P [1 ]
Sánchez-Fernández, D [1 ]
Velasco, J [1 ]
Millán, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Dept Ecol & Hydrol, Murcia, Spain
关键词
complementarity; conservation priorities; freshwater biodiversity; hotspots; southeast Spain; water beetles;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-004-0550-1
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The biodiversity of freshwater systems is endangered, especially in Mediterranean semiarid areas such as the south east of the Iberian Peninsula, whose rich and endemic biota is threatened by the development of surrounding land-crop irrigation. For this reason, the prioritization of areas for biodiversity conservation is an urgent target. In this study we used data records of water beetles from a province of the southeast of Spain for assessing priority areas for freshwater biodiversity conservation. We compare the performance of various area-selection methods, ranging from scoring procedures to complementarity-based algorithms, which are based on different criteria such as richness, rarity and vulnerability. The complementarity approaches were more efficient than methods using scoring or richness and rarity hotspots for representing conservation targets in a given number of areas and for identifying the minimum set of areas containing all species at least once. Within these, the richness-based algorithm was more efficient than rarity-based algorithm. Crucial target habitats for aquatic biodiversity conservation in the area studied are streams at medium altitude, hypersaline streams, and endorreic and karstic complexes.
引用
收藏
页码:3457 / 3474
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
ABELLAN P, 2004, IN PRESS BIOL CONSER
[2]  
AGGARWAL A, 2000, RESNET VER 1 1 MANUA
[3]  
Alba-Tercedor J., 1988, Limnetica, V4, P51
[4]   BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUNNING WATERS [J].
ALLAN, JD ;
FLECKER, AS .
BIOSCIENCE, 1993, 43 (01) :32-43
[5]  
Araujo M., 1998, Silva Lusitana, V6, P19
[6]   Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Williams, PH .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 96 (03) :331-345
[7]  
Araujo Miguel B., 1999, Diversity and Distributions, V5, P151, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00052.x
[8]   Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: a comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes [J].
Beger, M ;
Jones, GP ;
Munday, PL .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 111 (01) :53-62
[9]   Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation [J].
Benayas, JMR ;
de la Montaña, E .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 114 (03) :357-370
[10]   TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY IN THE UPPER RHONE RIVER AND ITS FLOODPLAIN [J].
CELLOT, B ;
DOLEOLIVIER, MJ ;
BORNETTE, G ;
PAUTOU, G .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1994, 31 (03) :311-325