Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK

被引:73
作者
Tully, L [1 ]
Gates, S [1 ]
Brocklehurst, P [1 ]
McKenzie-McHarg, K [1 ]
Ayers, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Hlth Sci, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Unit, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
关键词
caesarean section; surgical techniques;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00589-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine what surgical techniques are used by obstetricians in the UK for elective and emergency caesarean section operations, Study design: A postal questionnaire to all members and fellows of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) resident in the UK, requesting information about the use of surgical techniques and antibiotic and anticoagulant prophylaxis for elective and emergency caesarean sections. Results: The response rate was 78.7%. A range of techniques was used for all procedures in caesarean section operations. Only a few techniques were used by more than 80% of obstetricians. including double layer closure of the uterus, use of prophylactic antibiotics and Pfannenstiel abdominal entry (for elective caesarean sections). There were few large differences in practice between elective and emergency caesarean sections. In emergency operations, more obstetricians use the Joel-Cohen method of abdominal entry (32.7 versus 16%) and more usually use prophylactic antibiotics and heparin (93.2 versus 85.4% and 45.8 versus 32.9%, respectively). Conclusions: There was wide variation in the surgical techniques used by obstetricians for caesarean section operations. There is an urgent need for future research to evaluate many aspects of caesarean section operations on substantive short- and long-term outcomes. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 126
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   The effect of manual removal of the placenta on post-cesarean endometritis [J].
Atkinson, NW ;
Owen, J ;
Wren, A ;
Hauth, JC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (01) :99-102
[2]   Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section: influence on maternal morbidity [J].
Edi-Osagie, ECO ;
Hopkins, RE ;
Ogbo, V ;
Lockhat-Clegg, F ;
Ayeko, M ;
Akpala, WO ;
Mayers, FN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (10) :1070-1078
[3]  
ENKIN MW, 2001, COCHRANE REV
[4]  
Gates S, 2001, FETAL MATERN MED REV, V12, P105
[5]   Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section [J].
Grundsell, HS ;
Rizk, DEE ;
Kumar, RM .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 77 (01) :110-115
[6]   SURGICAL WOUND DRAINAGE - A SURVEY OF PRACTICES AMONG GYNECOLOGISTS IN THE BRITISH-ISLES [J].
HILTON, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1988, 95 (10) :1063-1069
[7]  
*HLTH COMM, 1999, PUBL EXP HLTH PERS S
[8]   Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section - evaluation of pain - a randomized study [J].
Hojberg, KE ;
Aagaard, J ;
Laursen, H ;
Diab, L ;
Secher, NJ .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 77 (07) :741-745
[9]   The effect of placental removal method on the incidence of postcesarean infections [J].
Lasley, DS ;
Eblen, A ;
Yancey, MK ;
Duff, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (06) :1250-1254
[10]  
LOMAS J, 1989, EFFECTIVE CARE PREGN