Modeling park development through regional land use change simulation

被引:23
作者
BenDor, Todd [1 ]
Westervelt, James [2 ]
Song, Yan [1 ]
Sexton, Joseph O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] USA, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Construct Engn Res Lab, Champaign, IL 61826 USA
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
Regional Urban Growth (RUG) model; Park and recreation planning; Urban open space; Level of service; Urban service provision; Urban growth modeling; OPEN SPACE; URBAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Provision of recreational open space is a major factor in determining resident quality of life in cities. However, urban growth and land use change models typically omit park location and allocation issues when simulating changing urban environments. This paper introduces a method for exploring the spatial allocation of urban parks (public, recreational open spaces) given differing municipal and county investment decisions. Park planning literature has established level of service metrics as rough indicators of provision of public park amenities that are useful guides for future park investment decisions within a given jurisdiction. In this study, we create a dynamic-demand location model that simulates political feedback from population growth and LOS metrics to allocate new parklands (similar to 0.5 ha <= neighborhood parks <= similar to 4 ha) in multi-jurisdictional urbanizing regions. We frame parks as a new development type that augments residential development currently driving a version of the Regional Urban Growth (RUG) urban simulation model, an open source, raster-based simulation platform. Our approach allows planners and researchers to explore urban patterns and distributive outcomes associated with different local open space requirements and investment choices. We illustrate this approach under scenarios for the rapidly growing, three-county Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill region of North Carolina, USA. We test varying delays in park planning, purchase, and construction, varying maximum park sizes, and the effects of increased investment levels in two jurisdictions within our study area. This model suggests that the most important aspect of successful park planning is the length of the lag time between residential and park development. Perhaps the most successful park planning strategy is to plan parks along with residential areas. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Agarwal C., 2002, NE297 US FOR SERV NE
[2]  
Anderson L., 2000, PLANNING BUILD ENV P
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, POLITICS PARK DESIGN
[4]  
[Anonymous], AM COMM SURV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MEASURING SPRAWL ITS
[6]  
BATTY M., 2001, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, V3, P252, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0303-2434(01)85032-7
[7]  
Berke P., 2006, URBAN LAND USE PLANN
[8]   Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies [J].
Brueckner, JK .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2000, 23 (02) :160-171
[9]  
Chin Y., 1995, THESIS U ILLINOIS UR
[10]   An empirical investigation of public choices for green spaces [J].
Choumert, Johanna .
LAND USE POLICY, 2010, 27 (04) :1123-1131