The influence of increasing dialysis treatment time and reducing dry weight on blood pressure control in hemodialysis patients: A prospective study

被引:37
作者
Luik, AJ
Van de Sande, FM
Weideman, P
Cheriex, E
Kooman, JP
Leunissen, KML
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Dept Internal Med, Dept Nephrol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] St Maartens Gasthuis, Dept Internal Med, Venlo, Netherlands
[3] Kuratorium Heimdialyse, Aachen, Germany
关键词
hemodialysis; blood pressure control; hypertension; dialysis time; fluid status; hemodynamics;
D O I
10.1159/000046651
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A good blood pressure control can be achieved with long hemodialysis sessions (dialysis center of Tassin, France). However, it is not well known whether a higher dialysis dose or a lower dry weight is responsible for this phenomenon. In a preliminary study, 21 hypertensive dialysis patients, dialyzed three times a week for 3-5 h, were randomized into three groups during a 3-month study period. In 6 patients, the dialysis treatment time was increased by 2 h, and the dry weight was gradually decreased (group 1). In 7 patients the dialysis treatment time was increased by 2 h without a change in dry weight (group 2). In 8 patients the dry weight was gradually lowered without changing the dialysis treatment time (group 3). Before and after the study, cardiac index and left ventricular mass index (echocardiography) and forearm vascular resistance (strain gauge plethysmography) were determined on a middialytic day. The blood pressure was assessed by 48-hour ambulatory monitoring. The anti hypertensive medication was reduced when the postdialytic blood pressure became <130/80 mm Hg. The dry weight was reduced by 2.6 +/- 1.4 kg in group 1 and by 2.3 +/- 0.8 kg in group 3 (p < 0.05). The number of classes of anti hypertensive medication was reduced from 3.3 to 1.8 in group 1 (NS), from 2.4 to 1.7 in group 2 (NS), and from 3.1 to 1.3 in group 3 (p < 0.05). The dose of the remaining antihypertensive drugs was reduced by 50% in group 1 (p < 0.05), by 32% in group 2 (NS), and by 72.2% in group 3 (p < 0.05). The interdialytic systolic blood pressure decreased significantly after increasing the dialysis time without changing the dry weight (group 2: 7 +/- 5 mm Hg; p < 0.05). The systolic blood pressure was also lower in the other patients groups: group 1: 13 26 mm Hg, group 3: 7 16 mm Hg (NS). The pulse pressure decreased significantly in group 2 (7 +/- 5 mm Hg; p < 0.05) and in group 3 (6 +/- 7 mm Hg; p < 0.05) and tended to decrease in group 1 (11 +/- 12 mm Hg; p = 0.08). The diastolic blood pressure and the day-night blood pressure difference did not change significantly, nor did cardiac index and left ventricular mass index. The forearm vascular resistance tended to decrease in the patients on long dialysis sessions. This preliminary study suggests that the dialysis treatment time might have an independent beneficial effect on blood pressure control. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 478
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bargman JM, 1997, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V17, P536
[2]   Inadequate diagnosis and therapy of arterial hypertension as causes of left ventricular hypertrophy in uremic dialysis patients [J].
Cannella, G ;
Paoletti, E ;
Ravera, G ;
Cassottana, P ;
Araghi, P ;
Mulas, D ;
Peloso, G ;
Delfino, R ;
Messa, P .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (01) :260-268
[3]   SURVIVAL AS AN INDEX OF ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS [J].
CHARRA, B ;
CALEMARD, E ;
RUFFET, M ;
CHAZOT, C ;
TERRAT, JC ;
VANEL, T ;
LAURENT, G .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 41 (05) :1286-1291
[4]   Blood pressure control in dialysis patients:: Importance of the lag phenomenon [J].
Charra, B ;
Bergström, J ;
Scribner, BH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 32 (05) :720-724
[5]   CONTROL OF BLOOD-PRESSURE IN LONG SLOW HEMODIALYSIS [J].
CHARRA, B .
BLOOD PURIFICATION, 1994, 12 (4-5) :252-258
[6]  
CHAZOT C, 1995, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V10, P831
[7]   ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS IN MAN - ANATOMIC VALIDATION OF METHOD [J].
DEVEREUX, RB ;
REICHEK, N .
CIRCULATION, 1977, 55 (04) :613-618
[8]  
Fujisawa M, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, P1889, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V11101889
[9]  
IFUDU O, 1996, NEW ENGL J MED, V334, P4203
[10]  
JAGENEAU AH, 1981, NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSI, P169