A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of a Classification-Based System for Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain

被引:57
作者
Apeldoorn, Adri T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ostelo, Raymond W. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
van Helvoirt, Hans [6 ]
Fritz, Julie M. [7 ,8 ]
Knol, Dirk L. [1 ,2 ]
van Tulder, Maurits W. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Med Ctr Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Hlth Sci, Fac Earth & Life Sci, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Earth & Life Sci, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Med Back Neck Ctr, The Hague, Netherlands
[7] Univ Utah, Dept Phys Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[8] Intermt Hlth Care, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
low back pain; classification; physical therapy guidelines; subgroups; randomized controlled trial; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; DIRECTIONAL PREFERENCE; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; CENTRALIZATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824d9f2b
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. A randomized controlled trial. Objective. To assess the effectiveness of Delitto's classification-based treatment approach compared with usual physical therapy care in patients with subacute or chronic low back pain. Summary of Background Data. No trial has evaluated this approach in patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. Methods. Before randomization, all patients were classified by research physical therapists according to a modified version of Delitto's classifi cation-based system. Randomization was computer-generated, with centralized allocation concealment. The statistician and the physical therapists were unblinded. Patients and assistants who collected follow-up questionnaires were blinded. Follow-up assessments were completed at 8, 26, and 52 weeks. The primary analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, using multilevel analysis. The main outcomes were global perceived effect, disability (Oswestry Disability Index, 0-100), and pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-10). Secondary outcomes were quality of life, fear-avoidance beliefs, and psychosocial status. Results. A total of 156 patients were included (classifi cation-based group, n = 74; usual physical therapy group, n = 82). There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for any of the outcomes at any of the follow-up time points. After 8 weeks, patients in the classifi cation-based group had greater global perceived effect scores; adjusted odds ratio of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 3.28), and higher adjusted Oswestry Disability Index and Numerical Rating Scale scores; mean adjusted differences of 0.48 points (95% CI, -4.59 to 3.63) and 0.49 points (95% CI, -1.34 to 0.37) respectively, but all differences were statistically nonsignificant. Conclusion. The classifi cation-based system used in this study was not effective for improving physical therapy care outcomes in a population of patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1347 / 1356
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
[Anonymous], NED TIJDSCHR FYSIO S
[2]
The cost-effectiveness of a treatment-based classification system for low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation [J].
Apeldoorn, Adri T. ;
Ostelo, Raymond W. ;
van Helvoirt, Hans ;
Fritz, Julie M. ;
de Vet, Henrika C. W. ;
van Tulder, Maurits W. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11
[3]
Bekkering GE, 2005, NED TIJDSCHR FYSIO S, V115, P1
[4]
Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute "nonspecific" low back pain - Results of a randomized clinical trial [J].
Brennan, GP ;
Fritz, JM ;
Hunter, SJ ;
Thackeray, A ;
Delitto, A ;
Erhard, RE .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (06) :623-631
[5]
Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test [J].
Brookes, ST ;
Whitely, E ;
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Mulheran, PA ;
Peters, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (03) :229-236
[6]
Coudeyre E., 2006, Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique, V49, P600, DOI 10.1016/j.annrmp.2006.05.003
[7]
A TREATMENT-BASED CLASSIFICATION APPROACH TO LOW-BACK SYNDROME - IDENTIFYING AND STAGING PATIENTS FOR CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT [J].
DELITTO, A ;
ERHARD, RE ;
BOWLING, R .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (06) :470-485
[8]
Self-Management of Chronic Neck and Low Back Pain and Relevance of Information Provided During Clinical Encounters: An Observational Study [J].
Escolar-Reina, Pilar ;
Medina-Mirapeix, Francesc ;
Gascon-Canovas, Juan J. ;
Montilla-Herrador, Joaquina ;
Fermin Valera-Garrido, J. ;
Collins, Sean M. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 90 (10) :1734-1739
[9]
The Oswestry Disability Index [J].
Fairbank, JCT ;
Pynsent, PB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) :2940-2952
[10]
Use and abuse of Oswestry Disability Index [J].
Fairbank, Jeremy C. T. .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (25) :2787-2789