An Assessment Methodology for Domestic Systemically Important Banks in Australia

被引:10
作者
Braemer, Patrick [1 ]
Gischer, Horst [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Econ & Management, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8462.2013.12008.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article serves as a response to the assessment methodology of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to identify systemically important banks. The official technique requires an extensive collection of bank data, which can hardly be accessed in full by the general public. By contrast, our article develops a practicable modification that utilises only readily available indicators and thus provides a helpful tool for banks' stakeholders and the public. For the period 2002-2011, we determine the domestic systemic importance of every licensed bank in Australia. Our quantitative results do not only uncover high levels of systemic impact of the four major banks, but their rising dominance during the Global Financial Crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 159
页数:20
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Acharya V., 2007, 319 BANK ENGL
[2]   A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation [J].
Acharya, Viral V. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2009, 5 (03) :224-255
[3]  
Adrian T., 2011, COVAR NO W17454, DOI [10.3386/w17454, DOI 10.3386/W17454]
[4]   Financial contagion [J].
Allen, F ;
Gale, D .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (01) :1-33
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GLOB SYST IMP BANKS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EC PERSPECTIVES
[7]  
Baker D., 2009, VALUE TOO BIG FAIL B
[8]  
Barrell R., 2010, 367 NAT I EC SOC RES
[9]  
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 2011, Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems
[10]  
Beck T., 2008, 4656 WORLD BANK