Do apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained using high b-values with a 3-T MRI correlate better than a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with true Gleason scores obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens for patients with prostate cancer?

被引:39
作者
Kitajima, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Takahashi, Satoru [1 ]
Ueno, Yoshiko [1 ]
Miyake, Hideaki [2 ]
Fujisawa, Masato [2 ]
Kawakami, Fumi [3 ]
Sugimura, Kazuro [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
[3] Kobe Univ, Div Diagnost Pathol, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
关键词
Prostate cancer; Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); Biopsy; Gleason score; Radical prostatectomy; CLINICAL UTILITY; GUIDED BIOPSIES; 3; T; AGGRESSIVENESS; TISSUE; GRADE; TUMOR; CONCORDANCE; TRANSITION; ZONES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Objective: To investigate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in predicting true Gleason scores from radical prostatectomy specimen (tGS), compared with systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy GS (bGS). Materials and methods: One hundred and five patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent preoperative DWI (b-values of 0, 1000, and 2000 s/mm(2)) of 3-T MRI. The mean and minimum ADCs of visible tumors were calculated for either of a pair of b-values: 0 and 1000 s/mm(2) (ADC(1000)), or 0 and 2000 s/mm(2) (ADC(2000)), and relationships between the four ADC parameters and tGS evaluated for the peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ). For multiple tumors, the dominant tumor's GS and ADCs were estimated for cancer aggressiveness assessment by computing ROC curves. Results: Significant negative correlations were observed between tGS and mean ADC(1000), mean ADC(2000), minimum ADC(1000), and minimum ADC(2000) (r = -0.41, -0.39, -0.39, and -0.37, respectively) of 100 visible PZ tumors and 66 visible TZ tumors (r = -0.40, -0.42, -0.29, and -0.21, respectively). For distinguishing high-grade from low/intermediate-grade PZ lesions, the areas under the curve (AUCs) of mean ADC(1000) (0.751), mean ADC(2000) (0.710), minimum ADC(1000) (0.768), and minimum ADC(2000) (0.752) were similar to that of the highest bGS (0.708) (p = 0.61, p = 0.98, p = 0.47, and p = 0.60, respectively). For distinguishing high-grade from low/intermediate-grade TZ lesions, AUCs of mean ADC(1000) (0.779), and mean ADC(2000) (0.811) were similar to that of the highest bGS (0.805) (p = 0.83 and p = 0.97). Conclusion: Tumor ADCs obtained with high b-values could predict prostate cancer aggressiveness as effectively as systematic TRUS-guided biopsy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1226
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours [J].
Bittencourt, Leonardo Kayat ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Duarte de Miranda, Luiz Carlos ;
Gasparetto, Emerson Leandro .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) :468-475
[2]
Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy [J].
Chan, TY ;
Partin, AW ;
Walsh, PC ;
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) :823-827
[3]
Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: Accuracy and clinical implications [J].
Cookson, MS ;
Fleshner, NE ;
Soloway, SM ;
Fair, WR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) :559-562
[4]
Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[5]
Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer [J].
Egevad, L ;
Granfors, T ;
Karlberg, L ;
Bergh, A ;
Stattin, P .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 89 (06) :538-542
[6]
PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[7]
Prospective Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using 3-T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsies Versus a Systematic 10-Core Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy Cohort [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Hoeks, Caroline ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina ;
Scheenen, Tom ;
Futterer, Jurgen ;
Bouwense, Stefan ;
van Oort, Inge ;
Schroder, Fritz ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
Barentsz, Jelle .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (01) :177-184
[8]
Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[9]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Prostate Biopsy in Men With Repeat Negative Biopsies and Increased Prostate Specific Antigen [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Hoeks, Caroline ;
Bouwense, Stefan A. W. ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
Yakar, Derya ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) :520-527
[10]
Hattab EM, 2006, J UROLOGY, V175, P1695, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00998-5