Factors influencing counts in an annual survey of Snail Kites in Florida

被引:16
作者
Bennetts, RE
Link, WA
Sauer, JR
Sykes, PW
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, SE Res Grp, Athens, GA 30602 USA
来源
AUK | 1999年 / 116卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/4089366
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Snail Kites (Rostrhamus sociabilis) in Florida were monitored between 1969 and 1994 using a quasi-systematic annual survey. We analyzed data from the annual Snail Kite survey using a generalized linear model where counts were regarded as overdispersed Poisson random variables. This approach allowed us to investigate covariates that might have obscured temporal patterns of population change or induced spurious patterns in count data by influencing detection rates. We selected a model that distinguished effects related to these covariates from other temporal effects, allowing us to identify patterns of population change in count data. Snail Kite counts were influenced by observed differences, site effects, effort, and water levels. Because there was no temporal overlap of the primary observers who collected count data, patterns of change could be estimated within time intervals covered by an observed, but not for the intervals among observers. Modeled population change was quite different from the change in counts, suggesting that analyses based on unadjusted counts do not accurately model Snail Kite population change. Results from this analysis were consistent with previous reports of an association between water levels and counts, although further work is needed to determine whether water levels affect actual population size as well as detection rates of Snail Kites. Although the effects of variation in detection rates can sometimes be mitigated by including controls for factors related to detection rates, it is often difficult to distinguish factors wholly related to detection rates from factors related to population size. For factors related to both, count survey data cannot be adequately analyzed without explicit estimation of detection rates, using procedures such as capture-recapture.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 323
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BIOMETRICS
[2]  
BARKER RJ, 1992, WILDLIFE 2001 : POPULATIONS, P182
[3]  
Beissinger S.R., 1983, Florida Field Naturalist, V11, P89
[4]  
Beissinger S.R., 1988, HDB N AM BIRDS, V4, P148
[5]   DEMOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY, AND THE EVOLUTION OF MATE DESERTION IN THE SNAIL KITE [J].
BEISSINGER, SR .
ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (06) :1445-1459
[7]  
BENNETS RE, 1997, 56 FLOR COOP FISH WI
[8]   Population dynamics and conservation of Snail Kites in Florida: The importance of spatial and temporal scale [J].
Bennetts, RE ;
Kitchens, WM .
COLONIAL WATERBIRDS, 1997, 20 (02) :324-329
[9]  
Bennetts Robert E., 1994, P507
[10]  
Buckland S. T., 1993, Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations.