Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study

被引:43
作者
Abd Ellatif, Mohamed E. [1 ]
Askar, Waleed A. [2 ]
Abbas, Ashraf E. [3 ]
Noaman, Nashat [3 ]
Negm, Ahmed [3 ]
El-Morsy, Gamal [3 ]
El Nakeeb, Ayman [2 ]
Magdy, Alaa [3 ]
Amin, Mahmoud [3 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Gastroenterol Ctr, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] Mansoura Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Fac Med, Mansoura, Egypt
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2013年 / 27卷 / 06期
关键词
Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic; Quality of life (QOL); Pain; Cosmoses; Analgesia; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INCISION; SITE; SCAR;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-012-2625-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SALC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). In a prospective study, patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomized to SALC or CLC with follow-up at 1 week, 1 and 6 months. The primary end point of this study was to assess the total outcomes of quality of life using the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire. The secondary end points were postoperative pain, analgesia requirement and duration of use, operative time, perioperative complications, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, cosmesis outcome, and number of days required to return to normal activities. A total of 269 patients were prospectively randomized into two groups (125 in each group after excluding 19 patients for various reasons). The SALC procedure was done safely without intraoperative or major postoperative complications. In four SALC patients, an extra epigastric port was inserted to enhance exposure. There was no open conversion in either group. SALC patients reported better results among four of the EuroQoL EQ-5D dimensions (mobility, self-care, activity, and pain/discomfort) at 1 week after surgery, an improved pain profile at 4, 12, and 24 h, better cosmetic outcome at 1 and 6 months (P a parts per thousand currency sign 0.01), shorter duration of need for analgesia (P a parts per thousand currency sign 0.02), and earlier return to normal activities (P a parts per thousand currency sign 0.026). Operative times, hospital stay, QOL at 1 and 6 months postoperatively, and estimated blood loss were similar for both procedures. This study supports other studies that show that SALC is a feasible and promising alternative to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected patients with better cosmesis, QOL, and improved postoperative pain results, and it can be performed with the existing laparoscopic instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:1896 / 1906
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Bresadola, F ;
Pasqualucci, A ;
Donini, A ;
Chiarandini, P ;
Anania, G ;
Terrosu, G ;
Sistu, MA ;
Pasetto, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 165 (01) :29-34
[2]
Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Bucher, P. ;
Pugin, F. ;
Buchs, N. C. ;
Ostermann, S. ;
Morel, P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (12) :1695-1702
[3]
A Case-control Study of Single-Incision Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [J].
Chang, Stephen Kin Yong ;
Tay, Chee Wei ;
Bicol, Ralph Allan ;
Lee, Yang Yang ;
Madhavan, Krishnakumar .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (02) :289-293
[4]
The "invisible cholecystectomy'': A transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar [J].
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
Berends, Frits ;
Veenhof, Alexander A. F. A. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (05) :1211-1213
[5]
The patient and observer scar assessment scale: A reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Botman, YAM ;
Tuinebreijer, WE ;
Middelkoop, E ;
Kreis, RW ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (07) :1960-1965
[6]
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160
[7]
A single institution's experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Fronza, Jeffrey S. ;
Linn, John G. ;
Nagle, Alexander P. ;
Soper, Nathaniel J. .
SURGERY, 2010, 148 (04) :731-734
[8]
How does infected bile affect the postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? [J].
GoldDeutch, R ;
Mashiach, R ;
Boldur, I ;
Ferszt, M ;
Negri, M ;
Halperin, Z ;
Lin, G ;
Sackier, J ;
Halevy, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (03) :272-274
[9]
Routine Administration of Antibiotics to Patients Suffering Accidental Gallbladder Perforation During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is not Necessary [J].
Guzman-Valdivia, Gilberto .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2008, 18 (06) :547-550
[10]
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Single institution experience and literature review [J].
Hirano, Yasumitsu ;
Watanabe, Toru ;
Uchida, Tsuneyuki ;
Yoshida, Shuhei ;
Tawaraya, Kanae ;
Kato, Hideaki ;
Hosokawa, Osamu .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (02) :270-274