Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay

被引:5
作者
Joshi, Aparna [1 ]
Liao, Hui
Jackson, Susan E.
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Management & Labor Relat, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
[3] GSBA, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794664
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Drawing on social identity theory and status-based perspectives, we describe how in-group/out-group dynamics affect performance differences and earnings inequalities between members of higher-status majorities (whites, males) and lower-status minorities (people of color, women). Among sales employees on 437 teams in 46 units of a large company, team demographic composition and unit management composition moderated the relationship between individual demographic attributes and pay. Ethnicity-based earnings inequalities were smaller in teams with proportionately more people of color, and gender- and ethnicity-based inequalities were smaller in units with proportionately more women and people of color as managers. Partial mediation by performance was found.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 481
页数:23
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
ALDERFER CP, 1992, DIVERSITY WORKPLACE, P138
[2]  
Allport G., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, BLACKWELL HDB SOCIAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], RES SOCIOL ORG
[5]  
[Anonymous], HDB PSYCHOL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WORKFORCE
[7]   SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY AND THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ASHFORTH, BE ;
MAEL, F .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) :20-39
[8]   Avenues of attainment: Occupational demography and organizational careers in the California civil service [J].
Barnett, WP ;
Baron, JN ;
Stuart, TE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 106 (01) :88-144
[9]   FOR WHAT ITS WORTH - ORGANIZATIONS, OCCUPATIONS, AND THE VALUE OF WORK DONE BY WOMEN AND NONWHITES [J].
BARON, JN ;
NEWMAN, AE .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 55 (02) :155-175
[10]   BRINGING THE FIRMS BACK IN - STRATIFICATION, SEGMENTATION, AND THE ORGANIZATION OF WORK [J].
BARON, JN ;
BIELBY, WT .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1980, 45 (05) :737-765